At least it's a home game on a Sunday afternoon, another of club's worthy arguments.skeepe said:MATCH SCHEDULE ROUND 8 (May 3 - 7)
Sunday 6 May, 2007
Raiders Vs Sea Eagles Canberra Stadium 2.00pm (Fox Live)
At least it's a home game on a Sunday afternoon, another of club's worthy arguments.skeepe said:MATCH SCHEDULE ROUND 8 (May 3 - 7)
Sunday 6 May, 2007
Raiders Vs Sea Eagles Canberra Stadium 2.00pm (Fox Live)
Instead of everyone else needing to get ratings figures to prove you wrong, how about you get us some figures to prove yourself right?Raider_69 said:bah this i bloody pointless, we can now assume based on this thread, that no one has any reason other then ill informed assumptions, to believe that canberra dont rate on FTA, so one can only conclude that once we win games and start playing a more attractive brand of footy (of which both will be occuring at sooner then you all think) we will feature on channel 9... when this DOES NOT happen ill happily revisit this topic to see what other excuses you lot can come up with
Far and away the biggest blow landed in this thread.Walt Flanigan said:Ok lets forget the Raiders for a second, what about the Warriors? 0 games even though they've won their first 2 smashing the eels and giving it to last years premiers.
Do they play boring footy? No, big hits and plenty of open attack.
The Cowboys apparently having 1 in the first 9 rounds? Probably the most entertaining side in the opening rounds. Ridiculous.
Channel 9 has it's darlings and always will. Thank Christ for Foxtel.
I didnt know we were in court....Raider_69 said:inncent until proven guilty
the onus is on people saying we dont rate to prove it to be true
Raider Ultra said:Geez, I'm sad I missed this 7 page Tigers wankathon.
VictorTheViking said:Wow, im actually the subject of peoples signatures now, I dont know whether to laugh or cry.
Raider_69 said:for about the sixth time this thread
assumptions are not proof, please provide sourceable proof that we dont rate
innsaneink said:I wouldnt be drawing peoples attention to it if I were you, but thats all you really are doing here, isnt it.
:roll:
mattyg said::lol: and you have had a mistake in your sig for 18 months. It only took inky to bring it up before you fixed it, and because of that you decide to chuck his name in your sig too. And then you find it amusing I put your f**k up in my sig?? bahaha
VictorTheViking said:Whats your point?? It was a spelling mistake.....lmfao, hardly the same, but feel free to continue being petty mattyg, it just shows the sort of person you are.
Balmain_Boy said:If you weren't an idiot it wouldn't be a problem.
EDIT: Found another mistake
http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showthread.php?t=165216&page=4
mattyg said::lol: at least i don't say something as blatantly stupid as what you said, and which deserves to be pointed out in my sig.
Yet youre petty enough to try and demean myself an HT in your sig- hypocrite.VictorTheViking said:Why not? I find it quite amusing if people are petty enough to parade mistakes of opposition fans in their signatures, even if said mistakes are my own.
Id say whats blatantly stupid is the fact that yourself and a few tigers fans seem to think that I give a f**k what is said on here??