no name
Referee
- Messages
- 20,123
First of all, whats with these absurd "what if's"
A judiciary isn't going to make a decision based on, as you describe here, Billy Slater was mimicking John Cleese in the Monty Python sketch about silly walks.
All you are doing there is trying to justify your biased hatred of the team and the player and thus, have absolutely no objectivity whatsoever.
You don't want to see it as anything else other than a blatant intentional incident when there is too much doubt to suggest that is at all the case.
The most absurd what if is what if Klemmer tackled Slater in the air.
Doesn't matter now, players are free to jump in the air studs facing out.