Gina Minehart
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,352
Shouldn't you be busy eating a large family for breakfast or something
It's not open yet :'(
Shouldn't you be busy eating a large family for breakfast or something
If you play NRL in super slo-mo, both would be gone for 45 weeks each.
At full speed it's clear neither were there to hurt Widdop - Pritchard was a genuine chance at the ball after charging it down and hardly had time to pull out - he's a big unit and can't turn on a dime. Kasiano was coming in for the tackle to wrap him up and got it wrong.
Both silly, might get a week each but neither were deliberately trying to hurt him ffs
I agree that Pritchard may not have been deliberate. But I think Kasiano's was. IMO, he didn't make an attempt at wrapping him up, he had his arms tucked in and led with the elbow
Yep, that could have been bad. Really bad.Don't think there was much in Pritchard's tackle- pretty hard for him to pull out and it was more his shins that made contact, not dropped knees.
Kasiano's tackle is fairly indefensible though- All he had to do was lay a hand on Widdop and the tackle would have been completed. There was no need to put 120kg of force recklessly onto Widdop's head and neck. I'm amazed he was able to get up and play the ball.
Maloneys kick was about 20 times worse than Pritchard's trip over the bloke who dived into the ground in front of him.
Maloney got no real penalty
Kasiano's was just a ferocious tackle
Widdop was fair game
No way Kasiano intentionally meant to get his head in that position .
If anything pritchard should have gone in harder. Maybe widdop would hAve gone off injured in not attempted a 40 20 and our season would still be alive lol