Against a team cheating the cap too.........I guess it's easier to lay the boot in though.......funnily enough was it not Hayne who basically said on national TV, that the coach foxed the great Wayne Bennett by giving them no game plan in round 26 and then coming out and destroying them week one go the finals? The poor bloke hadn't a clue!
Brian Smith also said he had no idea what happened in 2001.......
I would suggest what they mean is that they had no idea why whatever clicked them into gear, happened, but when they found that rhythm, they stuck with it and worked hard with it. Got them both to GF's. weren't the Knights over by 300k too?
In all fairness to SK, he did pretty well for us in 2011. We played a consistent, competitive brand of football, and just lacked anything in attack apart from Hayne. The major problem was in the halves. The biggest issue with 2011 is that it took us until round 11 to start playing 'proper' footy. By then the season was beyond us, and we had all those heartbreak losses after that.
A LOT of cause for optimism heading into 2012, especially considering the signing of 2 new halves, surely one of them would pan out. Again we started poorly, SK freaked out and started random experiments [no props, 6 props] and showed he was out of his depth. The management side of things had clearly overtaken him and again he failed to get the team 'up' in the first 10 rounds, by which time it was all too late.
We can all speculate about what went wrong, it certainly APPEARED as if it had all got on top of SK - and it seems like he's admitting that himself.
Doubtful that he's left the club in better shape than he found it, might not be much worse, but the regression since 2011 can't be simply blamed on old players - the heat goes onto the coach for not getting others to perform. I certainly don't hate the guy, but it was all too much for him, that's clear! Nobody is fool enough to argue he's excelled in any one particular area of being a head coach.
from all reports Kearney CHOSE to do it all himself ... and refused help until someone he would accept was brought in ..... he dug his own f'n grave there .... well our clueless board who bent over and did whatever for him handed him the shovel
Only saw the beginning of the thread title and clicked on it expecting a story on James Graham.
Jokes aside, those of you saying Kearney is the worst ever are obviously forgetting Paul Langmack.[/QUOTE]
There records are very similar. However Kearney had 2 players in the side that played origin (Hayne and Mannah) and Tonga who did so the year before Kearney got hold of him. Langmack had nobody
Agree with others. What disappointed me most was his denial. He insisted that he could salvage the Titanic single handedly after it was clear that we had already steered us into an iceberg.
I applaud Kearney for having the honesty and class to admit that he wasn't the right man for the job. In my humble opinion, the coaching position at Parramatta is THE hardest job in rugby league - our club can be poorly run at times, and its massive, passionate supporter base [rightfully] accepts nothing less than the best. It is a very big ask for a rookie coach to come into all this and have success in a relatively short period of time.
I think that overall, Kearney's tenure here was a failure, but he did do some great things for us. Possibly the biggest challenge he faced was trying to do everything himself at this nutcase of a club - it's tough enough to coach in the NRL, but factor in player management, lower grades infrastructure, etc. and it's a big deal, and the pressure undoubtedly got to him.
I agreed with Kearney's idea that the squad needs to learnt o play disciplined, grinding footy. I think the team tends to play better when they play ad lib football - however, teaching them to play simple, boring, mistake-free football, like Melbourne, is key to becoming successful. I don't think it's a secret that we've struggled to grind out games for some time now (with the odd rare exception). His tactic of trying to get us to learn to be disciplined and grind out games was correct, in my eyes, but for whatever reason, it didn't take.
For all the good and all the bad, Kearney is not an Eel anymore, but he did do some good things to help us and I appreciate it. He gave some talented youngsters a go, attracted some quality players to the club and began the clean-out of our playing ranks. I wish him the best.
Only saw the beginning of the thread title and clicked on it expecting a story on James Graham.
Jokes aside, those of you saying Kearney is the worst ever are obviously forgetting Paul Langmack.
Actually he got to start from scratch, which is a lot easier than taking over a poorly structured salary cap full of legacy long term contracts.
Actually he got to start from scratch, which is a lot easier than taking over a poorly structured salary cap full of legacy long term contracts.
Actually he got to start from scratch, which is a lot easier than taking over a poorly structured salary cap full of legacy long term contracts.
Langmack had to try and fix a club that had spent two years out of the competition, and had to assemble their entire squad from other club's discards, and at the same time have their own junior based raided by other clubs during the time they were out of the comp taking all your best junior players. Langmack was a terrible coach too, but he also had a lot less to work with Kearney.
yeah, he can argue both sides of the argument :lol:Lol that's why I love you Poupou.