I know I've done the right thing - Sonny Bill

[SaveTheChildren]

I'm going to tell you again STC.
Contract - Broken - Not on.

I'm not sure you're getting it but a few hours on the internet and wikipedia may open your eyes a little.
Because in the general scheme of things,when someone breaks a contract....it's illegal!

We aren't talking about the laws of physics mate. These laws are there to be broken. You try and force a bloke to play out his career on a 1/3 his value and he will break the law.

It doesn't matter that it is illegal.

 

[Kiki]

can we PLEASE just ignore this guy?

*begs*

 

[fred_knight]

you are a tosser save the children, just one of these tools who will go against the grain of normal society just to be a hero, "look at me i am different" you are not special, you are not different, you are just plain and simply a di*khead

 

[Timmah]

It doesn't matter that it is illegal.

:lol:

Seriously mate, f*ck off.

 

[Dragons84]

He is reffering to SBW wanting a 5yr deal on the basis of Canterbury doctor telling him he only has 5yrs left in his knee if he is lucky.

 

[SaveTheChildren]

How did they trick/use him? You're offering absolutely nothing. Come up with some substance or leave. Simple.

Begin by answering this.

Do you think SBW did the right thing signing a 5 year contract? Do you think he got good advice?

 

[Timmah]

He is reffering to SBW wanting a 5yr deal on the basis of Canterbury doctor telling him he only has 5yrs left in his knee if he is lucky.

Source?

 

[Timmah]

Begin by answering this.

Do you think SBW did the right thing signing a 5 year contract? Do you think he got good advice?

No, you're answering the questions. How did Gavin Orr or the Bulldogs RLFC trick or use him in regards to his signing a 5 year contract.

I can see you have no answers dancing gums, try another one.

 

[SaveTheChildren]

can we PLEASE just ignore this guy?

*begs*

Shouldn't you be at the gym pumping yourself up so you are ready to physically attack him when he gets back in accordance with your earlier claim?

 

[Dragons84]

Source?

It was brought up in the Sunday Roast video

 

[Timmah]

It was brought up in the Sunday Roast video

You'll find the information relayed on the Sunday Roast indicated that his father recommended he sign a longer contract. HE agreed to it, nobody forced his hand - now he's made his bed - he must lie in it. How can you defend this persons actions?

It's been said ad nauseum in this thread by both myself and others - Orr and the Bulldogs BOTH were after a 3 year contract.

 

[fred_knight]

Begin by answering this.

Do you think SBW did the right thing signing a 5 year contract? Do you think he got good advice?

Who gives a toss, he is old and ugly enough to decide that, and the advice he got was from his old man anyway..so your question is....wait for it....IRRELEVANT

 

[SaveTheChildren]

No, you're answering the questions. How did Gavin Orr or the Bulldogs RLFC trick or use him in regards to his signing a 5 year contract.

I can see you have no answers dancing gums, try another one.

Any club would have KILLED to sign SBW. His manager let him go ahead and sign his life away. That is disgraceful. Canterbury should have been big enough to stand by their 3 years max. No wonder they didn't offer him 5. They would have scarcely been able to believe it. Must have thought they won lotto.

 

[Timmah]

Any club would have KILLED to sign SBW. His manager let him go ahead and sign his life away. That is disgraceful. Canterbury should have been big enough to stand by their 3 years max. No wonder they didn't offer him 5. They would have scarcely been able to believe it. Must have thought they won lotto.

You're barely making sense. Take a bex and lie down.

 

[SaveTheChildren]

You'll find the information relayed on the Sunday Roast indicated that his father recommended he sign a longer contract. HE agreed to it, nobody forced his hand - now he's made his bed - he must lie in it. How can you defend this persons actions?

It's been said ad nauseum in this thread by both myself and others - Orr and the Bulldogs BOTH were after a 3 year contract.

And they should have stuck to their guns irrespective of SBW dads' advice. Pushing it to 5 was beyond greedy. If he didn't feel like his contract would never end - I doubt this situation would have arose.

 

[fred_knight]

Any club would have KILLED to sign SBW. His manager let him go ahead and sign his life away. That is disgraceful. Canterbury should have been big enough to stand by their 3 years max. No wonder they didn't offer him 5. They would have scarcely been able to believe it. Must have thought they won lotto.

Dude, seriously, do you not listen, or are you friggin stupid? the 5 years was under the advice of his dad..NOT GAVIN OR CANTERBURY, the were prepared to offer him 3 years, SBW, Dad and DOC wanted 5..what the fu&k did you want canterbury to do..say no!!!! you $hit is getting old and boirng lad....

 

[dallymessenger]

We aren't talking about the laws of physics mate. These laws are there to be broken. You try and force a bloke to play out his career on a 1/3 his value and he will break the law.

It doesn't matter that it is illegal.

:lol:

good stuff, comedy gold

 

[SaveTheChildren]

Dude, seriously, do you not listen, or are you friggin stupid? the 5 years was under the advice of his dad..NOT GAVIN OR CANTERBURY, the were prepared to offer him 3 years, SBW, Dad and DOC wanted 5..what the fu&k did you want canterbury to do..say no!!!! you $hit is getting old and boirng lad....

Of course they should have said no. The contract is offered by Canterbury - not his father.

 

[Timmah]

And they should have stuck to their guns irrespective of SBW dads' advice. Pushing it to 5 was beyond greedy. If he didn't feel like his contract would never end - I doubt this situation would have arose.

He went ahead and signed despite the advice of Gavin and the Bulldogs. He signed. He made the decision - he is the one who should be taking responsibility for his actions.

I'm going to the game now, have your fun. You're an idiot.

 

[salivor]

And why should they have said no?