The dockers generate a hell of a lot more than that from members and gate takings too. The point is that a Perth based NRL clubs will have neither the same demand, the same exposure or the same access to the same venue and its assets. Being well run doesnt equal being popular.
I stand by my assessment that the club will generate about 5-6m in sponsors and corporate sales, and about the same in ticket sales and memberships.
Its got everything to do with the club being based in Perth. Corporate box revenues and sales is driven by local demand. This is reflected in the 34m the Eagles made from memberships and the gate last year alone.
More sponsors does not necessarily indicate more valuable sponsors. The quality of sponsors at NRL clubs has been an issue for years.
And no one is claiming they will, but 50-60% of corporate revenue? Yeh I think that’s achievable. And if it isnt then they shouldn’t be letting a perth team in. Hitting 2/3rds of souths fan revenue based on their active fanbase, yeh od say that’s more than possible.
I think your underestimating what a perth nrl team can acheive but time will tell, if we get a chance.
If we hit only $12mill in corporates and fan revenue plus the grant we’ll be at around $30mill revenue. If that’s enough or not the nrl will know.
some nrl clubs are generating double what eagles are just in the sponsorship area, given the size and as you say the popularity of the eagles that is very interesting and makes you wonder why? Only thing I can think of is that afl doesn’t plaster its kits in sponsors.