I think the competition is just creating a bigger division between the well run clubs and the poorly run clubs.
I think the whole "not having enough talent" is garbage.
In my professional life I don't sit around each day whinging about the lack of talent...
It is the clubs job to work with what they have in terms of recruitment and production of talent with the best systems in place to give them the best possible chance of being successful.
It is not a coincidence the clubs with the best front office's, resources, culture and systems are the ones maintaining heightened levels of success for longer periods of time.
Agree with this. I would say the last not so well run club to win was Manly in the late 00s and early 10s.
A club with a good front office is generally also a club with a good team. Souths, Parra, Melbourne, Roosters are all well run clubs.
Having said this, if there are consistently 5 good teams, winning a comp will make it so hard. You need an ace up your sleeve which no one has seen yet to win the comp.