Generalzod
Immortal
- Messages
- 33,853
More Melbourne teams you know we all want it lol
The report said one place on the board so doesn’t look like they are suggesting an equal joint ownership.Whether or not the Ipswich/Bombers bid merging with Easts is a good idea really depends on the ins and outs of the deal.
If there's an expectation of an equal say in club affairs, games played annually in Ipswich, etc, etc, it'd probably end up being more trouble than it's worth IMO.
Easts would probably be better off just beating the Jets in the bidding process, then trying to sign them as an affiliate club when their deal with Newcastle ends. That way all the same benefits would be achieved without risking all the unnecessary BS that goes along with disjointed mergers. We don't need Wests Tigers 2.0.
I don't know much about Wynnum Manly's financial situation, but a marriage between them and Easts, for NRL purposes, would probably be a better fit, assuming that a good deal could be struck and they weren't looking to do anything crazy.
The Brisbane Jets have declared they have the funds to meet the NRL’s $10 million bank guarantee as the Mayor of Ipswich outlined the $250 million stadium plan to make the expansion hopefuls an NRL force.Anyone access this?
The same NSWRL that expanded to Canberra, Wollongong, Brisbane, Newcastle, the Gold Coast-Tweed, North Qld, NZ and W.A in the next 15 years?Which is ironic considering the NSWRFL and Sydney media claimed state of origin was a stupid concept when the QRL pushed the idea. The NSWRFL and Sydney media claimed Queenslanders were insane and stupid for wanting to select players on origin, rather than the competition they played in. They predicted the SOO match in 1980 would be a dud and they would return to the Representatives format in 1981.
Suns up NSWRL's views on expansion.
I'm suggesting we go a step further and admit 4 new teams:More teams at top flight means more players playing at top flight, so expansion can happen with or without covid disruptions, yes reserve grade has been put off, but adding another team in SEQ won't hamper that
Who would you suggest as the coaches for those teams then? Excluding current coaches I'd go Bennett, Flanagan (ban will have ended), Tooves and Neil HenryI'm suggesting we go a step further and admit 4 new teams:
Firehawks (Brisbane)
Dolphins (Northside Brisbane/ Peninsula)
Pirates (W.A)
Bears (North shore/ Central Coast)
The issue with overall quality in the NRL atm has more to do with coaching than playing talent available.
Also no way should Central coast get a team before NZ gets a secondI'm suggesting we go a step further and admit 4 new teams:
Firehawks (Brisbane)
Dolphins (Northside Brisbane/ Peninsula)
Pirates (W.A)
Bears (North shore/ Central Coast)
The issue with overall quality in the NRL atm has more to do with coaching than playing talent available.
Why shouldn't the Bears (with a combined area of 1 million+ and some of the biggest corporate sponsorship on it's doorstep) get in ahead of NZ getting a second team?Also no way should Central coast get a team before NZ gets a second
Those are all decent candidates for starters, then you have potential overseas coaches doing well like Shaun Wayne.Who would you suggest as the coaches for those teams then? Excluding current coaches I'd go Bennett, Flanagan (ban will have ended), Tooves and Neil Henry
Because Sydney already has too many teams, we should be looking to expand into new areas. North Sydney is basically an extension of the CBD and the roosters should look to build a bigger fanbase thereWhy shouldn't the Bears (with a combined area of 1 million+ and some of the biggest corporate sponsorship on it's doorstep) get in ahead of NZ getting a second team?
The NSWRL killed long and established competitions so that a dozen Sydney clubs could become relevant in new markets. It was great for Sydney, but terrible for everyone else. What they replaced these competitions with didn't make up for what they took away. We're now seeing the damage caused by having just one team in Brisbane. If there were 3 teams in Brisbane then the Broncos' fall from grace wouldn't be so disastrous on ratings and attendances. Having all the teams playing in Queensland due to COVID-19 wouldn't be costing the game so much money if there were fewer teams from Sydney and more from Brisbane. With three Brisbane clubs the NRL could have a local team playing at Lang Park on Thursday, Friday and Saturday night with the Titans playing at Robina Stadium on Sunday arvo. Attendances would be higher and the NRL could run double headers on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, with one game played on the Sunshine Coast and one in Townsville.The same NSWRL that expanded to Canberra, Wollongong, Brisbane, Newcastle, the Gold Coast-Tweed, North Qld, NZ and W.A in the next 15 years?
Roosters should look at building a fanbase on the North Shore. Manly should focus on Northern Beaches and Central Coast.Because Sydney already has too many teams, we should be looking to expand into new areas. North Sydney is basically an extension of the CBD and the roosters should look to build a bigger fanbase there
The Central Coast is no more part of Sydney than the Sunshine Coast is part of Brisbane. The Central Coast not only has a fantastic stadium ready to go, but it is also the largest junior league area in NSW without NRL representation. No chance of the Roosters relocating there. With the Bears you get a foundation club back, relocated to an area with plenty of future growth.Because Sydney already has too many teams, we should be looking to expand into new areas. North Sydney is basically an extension of the CBD and the roosters should look to build a bigger fanbase there
But who else was planning to expand the game at the time? Not the BRL/ QRL. Had the NSWRL not expanded into Brisbane, we would've continued with two completely separate state competitions for who knows how long. The mistake the NSWRL made was allowing the Broncos to have exclusivity to SEQ, rather than adding two new Qld teams in 1988 whether the Broncos and another bid OR inviting BRL sides like Wynnum/ Redcliffe to join a bigger comp. As it was, the NSWRL soon realised it wasn't good for the Broncos to have a monopoly on SEQ and that's why they introduced the Crushers.The NSWRL killed long and established competitions so that a dozen Sydney clubs could become relevant in new markets. It was great for Sydney, but terrible for everyone else. What they replaced these competitions with didn't make up for what they took away. We're now seeing the damage caused by having just one team in Brisbane. If there were 3 teams in Brisbane then the Broncos' fall from grace wouldn't be so disastrous on ratings and attendances. Having all the teams playing in Queensland due to COVID-19 wouldn't be costing the game so much money if there were fewer teams from Sydney and more from Brisbane. With three Brisbane clubs the NRL could have a local team playing at Lang Park on Thursday, Friday and Saturday night with the Titans playing at Robina Stadium on Sunday arvo. Attendances would be higher and the NRL could run double headers on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, with one game played on the Sunshine Coast and one in Townsville.
I might be mistaken here, but wasn't that just an outcome of NSWRL (read Sydney) just having more money than the BRL/QRL? Pokies, basically.But who else was planning to expand the game at the time? Not the BRL/ QRL.
I wasn't saying that Central coast was apart of Sydney, but they don't need a team either. If you think Redcliffe can represent people in sunshine coast, then why can't manly also represent Central coast, they could even play 2 or 3 games there a year.The Central Coast is no more part of Sydney than the Sunshine Coast is part of Brisbane. The Central Coast not only has a fantastic stadium ready to go, but it is also the largest junior league area in NSW without NRL representation. No chance of the Roosters relocating there. With the Bears you get a foundation club back, relocated to an area with plenty of future growth.
They did add 2 seq teams in 1988The mistake the NSWRL made was allowing the Broncos to have exclusivity to SEQ, rather than adding two new Qld teams in 1988
I wasn't saying that Central coast was apart of Sydney, but they don't need a team either. If you think Redcliffe can represent people in sunshine coast, then why can't manly also represent Central coast, they could even play 2 or 3 games there a year.
They did add 2 seq teams in 1988
I might be mistaken here, but wasn't that just an outcome of NSWRL (read Sydney) just having more money than the BRL/QRL? Pokies, basically.
Even IF Queensland had the desire to expand into new markets, they probably wouldn't have had the resources to do it.. certainly not compared to the guys south of the border.