SharkShocked
Bench
- Messages
- 4,563
lol, who gives a f**k? The cheats got done
Next time maybe follow the thread and the discussion.
lol, who gives a f**k? The cheats got done
Maxwell is a horrible ref, always has been, always will be.
In this game he made a wrong decision that did favour the Tigers. It was a crucial call and probably did cost the Sharks the game. He did the same in the Warriors semi final last year, where I thought it was a horribly one-sided ref performance that the Warriors did very well to overcome.
Does he purposely favour the Tigers? No. Is there a directive from the NRL to favour the Tigers? No. To suggest so is just absolutely ridiculous. (So yes, shut the f**k up Skeepe). Maxwell is just a shit, incompetent ref full stop.
IMO it is a simple case of the fancied sides often getting the favourable calls. The Sharks have been on the wrong end of poor referring for a long while now. It is unfair. The same happened to the Tigers pre-2010. Maxwell was the same ref who was tackled by a fan at Campbelltown Stadium a few years back for yet another horrible officiating performance. In fact before last year I would say Maxwell HATED the Tigers, as he used to cripple us every game, and I used to cringe when he was appointed on Tuesdays.
Next time maybe follow the thread and the discussion.
:lol: Maybe next time your boys will show something resembling a killer instinct & win a game they should have
:lol: Maybe next time your boys will show something resembling a killer instinct & win a game they should have
It's official, the Canberra Raiders were robbed.
More NRL whistle-blowers face the axe this morning after admissions from referees coach Russell Smith that two try-scoring calls against the Raiders on Saturday night were officially wrong.
After completing his video review of the match yesterday, Smith said Blake Ferguson's no-try in the 37th minute should have been awarded to Canberra, while Cooper Cronk's try for Melbourne in the seventh minute should have been disallowed.
The calls were potentially a 12-point turn-around against the Raiders, who lost 24-19 after Storm fullback Billy Slater scored the winning try in the dying minutes.
Raiders coach David Furner was still fuming yesterday, but he refused to distract his team's preparation from this Saturday's match against the Titans on the Gold Coast.
Asked if officials should be sacked over the blunders, Furner said: ''That's for [referees coaches] Stuart Raper and Bill Harrigan to work out, but I'd like to have something done because we can't get the two points back.
''Someone has to be accountable, I am.
''With that against us, I'm very proud of the way my players fought back to take the lead in the second half and we nearly had the opportunity to win the game. I can't change the result now, we've got to look at this week and turn our focus to winning against the Titans.''
Referee Jared Maxwell and touch judge Jason Walsh were yesterday stood down for their golden-point error which denied the Cronulla Sharks an opportunity to win against the Wests Tigers.
Smith said Harrigan and Raper would decide today whether any officials from the Canberra game would be reprimanded.
''We've got to assess that as a management,'' Smith said. ''Obviously that [the wrong calls] has an impact in a close game like that was. We've got to look at that in the cold light of day tomorrow before they [Harrigan and Raper] conclude the appointments and they'll make the decision as to whether they believe any further action needs to be taken.''
While the no-try ruled against Ferguson has received the most publicity, it is the try awarded to Cronk that could be subject to more scrutiny by the NRL referee bosses.
Cronk grubbered ahead and, following a deflection, reached around Canberra's Terry Campese to score.
The decision was referred to video referee Phil Cooley, who ruled a try.
However, Melbourne prop Bryan Norrie was clearly in front of Cronk at the time of the kick and continued to chase the ball, diving and almost scoring himself.
Smith said Norrie should have been ruled off-side because he had continued have an impact on play.
''I believe that should have been a no-try,'' Smith admitted. ''In my opinion Bryan Norrie is certainly within 10m of Terry Campese.
''You could even argue his visual impact on Campese … you would think Campese would have felt his presence. So in my opinion we've got to have deemed he was inside the 10m and he wasn't passive [in the play].''
While the mistake in the Cronk try was a blatant ruling error, Smith said the decision against Ferguson was a judgment call.
Ferguson looked to have given the Raiders a lead by crashing over in the corner, but the try was disallowed because of a contentious forward-pass call against halfback Josh McCrone.
Smith admitted he was concerned that control referee Brett Suttor had taken the advice of pocket-referee, Gavin Badger, instead of the touch judge who was in better position.
The touch judge ruled the pass was legitimate. ''I believe it should have been a try,'' Smith said.
''There's going to be some momentum in a pass of that distance when there's a guy running forward at speed like McCrone was.
''So my opinion is that's a fair pass.
''He [the touch judge] has got a better view of the hands and in his opinion he believes the ball came out of the hands backwards.''
Furner would only say that he was ''extremely disappointed''.
''Take the touch judges away if they can't make that call,'' he said.
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/raiders-were-ripped-off-20120305-1uesd.html
Troll harder.
Are you capable of following a conversation?
St George fan... pop up books would be a struggle for you.
We certainly didn't show a killer instinct by going for goal. I know we were literally out on our feet but we were all over them then & should have put the game to bed.
Alas, we need to build confidence to do that & when you forget how to win, you tend to take the safer approach.
We have lost that many games in the last 5 or 10 over the last few years, it's tragic but we still don't seem to learn. Any other close scoreline than leading by 2 a kick was appropriate.
The NRL have admitted more refereeing stuff-ups:
For the record i don't agree with this. We would have had an improved chance to win the game sure... but it certainly was not guaranteed.
Could have done a Matt Orford style knock on at the scrum... dropped ball from a pass anything.... i
However i just don't agree with the earlier mentioned theory about good teams getting over bad decisions. Some aren't avoidable.
It all comes back to the Melbourne's, Manly's, Bronco's, Tiger's get the favorable calls while the teams not expected to compete with these teams get the rough end of the pineapple. Like TV coverage, ref's have made the competition unfair & biased.
Plus put 2 idiots in charge of pink idiots what do you get??
Oops, we are sorry about that...there's always next year.
It all comes back to the Melbourne's, Manly's, Bronco's, Tiger's get the favorable calls while the teams not expected to compete with these teams get the rough end of the pineapple. Like TV coverage, ref's have made the competition unfair & biased.
Plus put 2 idiots in charge of pink idiots what do you get??
Oops, we are sorry about that...there's always next year.
Cry foul all you like but Manly certainly don't always get the favourable calls.
Are you serious? Do you actually watch footy or just talk about it? Do you know how many times incidents have come up in the "Official View" thing on the nrl website saying that Manly were dudded? A few off the top of my head include 2 tries against Souths last year (both in the same game), the knock on against the Cowboys also last year, the 5m forward pass by Parra in 2010, the Gasnier knock on try also 2010. Cry foul all you like but Manly certainly don't always get the favourable calls. An argument could be put forward for the Tigers and maybe the Donkeys but that's about it.