Gary Gutful
Post Whore
- Messages
- 52,964
Way to prove Baz's point!
Way to prove Baz's point!
You and El D would make a great pair of homophobes tbh.....
I watch a lot of games and see a lot of inconsistences as well. No arguments there. However, I don't see any teams being 'favoured'. That is just bullshit.
For every time you point out an example of where Parra got a rough deal you are likely missing out on an example of where they got a good call. Likewise when you rush to point out an example of where the storm are 'favoured' you've probably missed an instance where they are shafted. That's fine though, its not your job to be impartial.
So you're a fan of cecchin Jnr's situation? Just asking
I think we should agree to disagree.Maybe favoured isn't the term i should use. At the referees own admissions they watch tape etc. to gauge what to look for to penalise teams in following games.
If that's the case they are trained to look at what certain teams do consistently and over time they desensitise to what they are doing. That would explain the reason reason 2 identical tackles are treated differently between teams.
Shit teams like say Newcastle currently are most definitely penalised more harshly in games when they are playing say the Cowboys. In those games you can't tell me you are scratching your head at how tackles are interpreted differently between the 2 teams?
I am not suggesting there is cheating, or knowing bias but if you are going to get referees to study tape then you are going to inadvertently train them to look only for circumstances where they (teams) go above the level they are currently playing at.
And because we are completely shit consistently it will take us a long time to earn the right to not be penalised for tackles that other teams who have earned the right to be overlooked for their play.
100%Don't have a single problem with it. Why should I? If both his parents (or step parents, no idea what Cecchins partners situation is in regards to the child) love him and he's appropriately cared for, what earthly reason would anyone have to object?
I think we should agree to disagree.
I thought we had said before that there was inconsistency in refereeing? Now you appear to be saying that a team is refereed in a consistent manner from week to week based on the way they play?
I don't buy it. Even if they wanted to referee in a preconceived way, there is far too much grey in the game for them to ever consistently apply things in the same way.
Agreed. Cheers Korny.You are right though, we will agree to disagree.
his son would be in his 20's as he came out in 2012 and after his son had done his HSCSo you're a fan of cecchin Jnr's situation? Just asking
GRAND final referee Matt Cecchin has revealed he is gay.
A closely held secret among parts of the rugby league community for the past six years, Cecchin has chosen to go public after his teenage son completed his HSC last year.
his son would be in his 20's as he came out in 2012 and after his son had done his HSC
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...r/news-story/061c4cdc99acdd86187d30bc86c28914
Honestly, yeah it is. But I reckon that's part of the aura about it. To win, in spite of the shitness that comes with the gameIt's actually a pretty f**ken stupid game when you think about it.
It was like he was putting a finger in the dyke of the homo jokesWasn't sure of his age but I guess different strokes for different folkes I suppose.
I guess he was trying to protect his son from mainstream views/bullying/homo jokes during his son's teenage years.
I reckon we got every call in the Manly game. I didn't see merkins talking about bias then. Except on the Silvertails forum.when Parra are playing he has different interpretations in the same game
if the opposition strip the ball it = a Parra knock on
if the opposition drop the ball it = a Parramatta strip and penalty to the oposition
How is a child going to be appropriately cared for without a good woman around? Have you seen what a house looks like with a couple of blokes and no women living in it? It's like that TV show with Charlie Sheen, Matthew Broderick and the fat kid.Don't have a single problem with it. Why should I? If both his parents (or step parents, no idea what Cecchins partners situation is in regards to the child) love him and he's appropriately cared for, what earthly reason would anyone have to object?
100%
What's your reason for objecting IFR33K?
You guys are living a fairytale if you believe a large portion of society wouldn't have an issue with this.
.
Literally none of the people I know have a problem with this....then again, I don't associate with stone age bible thumpers and ultra conservative bigots.
Sorry we haven't conformed to your ways.
Meh. There are bigger f**ken issues to worry about than two gay men raising a child.You guys are living a fairytale if you believe a large portion of society wouldn't have an issue with this.
It's just like saying racism doesn't exist. It's just due to PC people refrain from commenting.