I sort of had this discussion yesterday in the soccer thread.
You’ve got your top tier administrators - Politis, Ponissi, Cameron, Gould, maybe Richardson still
Now rank the others after that and you’ll probably find you can barely name a couple.
Sports admin is highly specialised and has glamour to it that attracts people who may or, more likely, may not actually have the skills to do it. The skills are learnable (see Politis) but also the teachers are limited and, especially in rugba leeg, may not always have the purest intentions on passing on those skills.
Does it mean we should settle for whatever? Of course f**ken not. But a change decision needs to be weighed up with what hopefully the current f**kers should have learnt from the latest f**kups.
You were correct that making the GF was double edged as it was biased towards “we did most things correctly and with a bit of extra luck maybe we bring it home” rather than realising the flip side of Pou’s Luck Theorem that just because you did something successfully doesn’t mean you weren’t equally affected by luck to be successful, meaning you didn’t do that thing correctly.
On top of that, I’m not sold on if we fully understand how we were able to produce those few ok years. We certainly didn’t know how to improve and/or maintain them.