canberra_raiders2k2
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,255
Ring Gids
Do you still maintain that not one player will be suspended over this?
Back then I never thought supply would be an issue. I thought it would just be possession, 1st strike with the NRL, a fine, end of story. IF (big if) supply is proven then of course suspensions will happen.
What's a whtte line? ;-)
There's an important lesson in this for all players.
And that is, let your groupies and hangers on organise your illegal drug supply in the future.
Does the first strike still apply if you end up charged and found guilty of possession in court?Back then I never thought supply would be an issue. I thought it would just be possession, 1st strike with the NRL, a fine, end of story. IF (big if) supply is proven then of course suspensions will happen.
Does the first strike still apply if you end up charged and found guilty of possession in court?
There would be other clauses about bringing the game into disrepute etc
I know people who have been caught in possession who have got off with cautions and no criminal record (is that correct terminology)
There's been people not caught but dumb enough to tell anyone who asks . . . one in particular expects to live forever
I know people who have been caught in possession who have got off with cautions and no criminal record (is that correct terminology)
Getting of with a caution would probably be OK for most people but I'm sure the NRL will come down hard on these guys unless they get found not guilty.
werent we all told last week that this is just the tip of the iceberg, there are many big names to come...
Who... Ash Harrison and Steve Michaels...
And now QCC is on record saying no more sports "stars" are in the gun ....
Meanwhile the other code has a player being investigated for sexual assault running around this weekend.
Wasn't sure. Was being circumspect.don't you mean charged?