I wonder if any players are in the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. I know I am, and pretty sure Frailty is too.
http://www.venganza.org/
The proof goes something like
You can't detect an object as small as a bowl of spaghetti floating around in space, we don't have the technology to do so. That means you can't prove or disprove its existance, however unlikely. Likewise, if you were to claim that the spaghetti is some sort of deity, you can't prove it is or isn't.
Now, assume you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster's existance, and an event occurs on earth, you apply "post hoc ergo propter hoc" logic to it, and cite divine intervention as the cause.
You can then easily attribute things that are difficult to comprehend, such as death, life, evolution, creation, purpose to the FSM as a way to reasure your mind. The lack of evidence of the FSM's involvement in these things is put down to him testing our faith, or his deliberate interfering with science.
People with power see the faith people have in the FSM, and manipulate its core tenants and story to use it as a form of control. The story grows and grows, gets more and more elaborate over time, contradicting itself on several issues, has to change itself to fit issues that have been solved by other means (science) and eventually faces the problem of being disproven.
So its followers strongly oppose those who question if the FSM ever existed in the first place, which is a valid question.
EDIT: Why would one religion be anymore relevant than another? They are all just as loony as Pastafarianism. What it comes down to is that we are all really agnostic - no one can know for sure if there is or isn't a god, so we should all just stop worrying about it and get on with our lives.
EDIT: Here is what Bertrand Russel suggested in 1952:
http://www.cfpf.org.uk/articles/religion/br/br_god.html
If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.
This sort of group think and indoctrination explains why the Church opposed galileo when he suggested the earth was round, and opposes evolution. Indoctrination also explains the sporting landscape in different countries, most noticably here.
