2010
Bench
- Messages
- 3,490
He is related to the great one, Sid EinfieldIndeed he will
He is related to the great one, Sid EinfieldIndeed he will
Willow, what are the processes to delete my profile from this forum?I can assure that you don't speak for everyone. Just my observations and I'm not taking sides, but there are better ways to conduct an argument.
This business of constantly belittling your opponent, making fun of mental health, telling them to shut up, trying to bully them into leaving the room and then topping it off by making out you have the support of everyone else in the room, doesn't do your argument any favours at all.
Willow, what are the processes to delete my profile from this forum?
Ok. Your continued refusal to provide the link can only lead you me to believe that at best you misrepresented the data you claimed it proved or maybe went so far as to falsify it.Tell you what my guy - you provide a single piece of data supporting your false claim, and then I’ll find the link. Come on, it’s your false claim, surely you didn’t just pull it out of your arse?
If you’re actually interested it’s somewhere earlier in this thread when I first posted that graph in response to someone making a similar claim. They were honest enough to stop making it though. You?
The Net Promoter Score (NPS) probably dipped on the back of Hayne, Beattie, there being no footy being played, different participants in the survey group from last time, or any number of other factors.
If this is what the NRL is relying on, I would think even Denis Denuto could tear apart its legitimacy.
Beattie is a lawyer.
Dennis Denuto would own his arse.
I'm afraid he (Beattie) is in the early stages on senility or some other neurological condition. If he had just come right out and said something like: "The NRL follows the rule of law and that is non-negotiable. He is innocent unless proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. Therefore we won't pursue any action against Mr. de Belin until the court case is completed." It would hardly be getting a mention in the media by now.Not a very good one.
This is what is classed as a passive-aggressive denouncement of Jack. Your analogy is absurd unless you think there is a danger of Jack sexually assaulting opposition players during NRL games.Time for people to take a reality check.
Does anyone think that the 20 year old swim coach with all the charges against him should be in the pool?
After all they are only allegations, he is out on bail, he has claimed complete innocence over all charges, his family and friends at this point are sticking by him, so surely he has a right to keep earning a dollar doing what his job, doesn't he?
Now, no doubt people will say, well there is more than 1 charge and more than 1 complainant but is it our right to say that it has to be more than 1 for us to consider it worthy of action?
For everyone's sake let the legal system do its work and let the NRL try to get some integrity around what is the correct thing to do at such a very traumatic time for many people.
Some people happy for Jack not to be a victim but also happy for a potential victim to be even more of a victim.
As I say let the legalities be handled by the experts and let's stick to talking footy.
This is what is classed as a passive-aggressive denouncement of Jack. Your analogy is absurd unless you think there is a danger of Jack sexually assaulting opposition players during NRL games.
Does anyone think that the 20 year old swim coach with all the charges against him should be in the pool?
After all they are only allegations, he is out on bail, he has claimed complete innocence over all charges, his family and friends at this point are sticking by him, so surely he has a right to keep earning a dollar doing what his job, doesn't he?
Hence, "passive-aggressive" denouncement, you simplistic fool.Is that what he said dimwit ?
Did you again " selectively pick " one line out of the whole paragraph to suit your argument?
F....k off.
So why do you bother replying to me? I got sick of Rob Dragons nonsense so I just ignore him. If Damo can't provide that f**king link, he is going to join the club. And of course you will for being so insufferable.Hence.. " f**k off. "
You are a troll and a poor one.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha -Ok. Your continued refusal to provide the link can only lead you me to believe that at best you misrepresented the data you claimed it proved or maybe went so far as to falsify it.
So I'm wondering, has Jack wronged your personally or you just don't like the rule of law?
So why do you bother replying to me? I got sick of Rob Dragons nonsense so I just ignore him. If Damo can't provide that f**king link, he is going to join the club. And of course you will for being so insufferable.
That's nice. You have "called me out". Now you have my permission to ignore me.Because you need to be called out for the troll you are.
Now, u have been defended here by some good folk, but to use your signature work... You are a f.....g prick
That's nice. You have "called me out". Now you have my permission to ignore me.
Are you serious? Where is the f**king link to the graphic your showed a few days ago????Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha -
Says the guy who has provided zero evidence for the false claim “ the bar is set very low to be charged with rape”.
Your continued refusal to produce ANY evidence can only lead me to believe you got the idea from some neckbeard incel on YouTube.
Come on dude, you made the claim - where do you know that from?
Now it looks to me that you are arguing in bad faith due to your refusal to provide a single piece of evidence, but I’m an optimist and out of my commitment to educating the ignorant, try these on for size.
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www...ws-story/9fc4a65689f180b3534d79f4fd019b8e/amp
https://aifs.gov.au/publications/sexual-assault-laws-australia
http://www.casa.org.au/casa_pdf.php?document=statistics
https://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Documents/sexualattributiondiagrams.pdf
Fine, so don't.Nope,
I wont ignore you.
Thats what u want...
So "f......ck" NO.
Have a nice night prick.
Fine, so don't.