IFR33K
Coach
- Messages
- 17,043
Our middle defence was good enough last year. It got us top 4 and a grand final. This year it is much worse. It’s utter shit.
The biggest difference from last year to now is Hodgson.
Our middle defence was good enough last year. It got us top 4 and a grand final. This year it is much worse. It’s utter shit.
Name them all pleaseOur middle defence is not what got us Top 4. There are at least a million other better reasons as to why we made Top 4.
Oh, shit. LU seems to have lost my first 999,998 posts.
Because I was replying to your comment in a colloquial manner. Since you had a showed a lack of comprehension relative to my previous points I figured it was better to use language you seemed to be able to understand. Instead it turns out you are playing gotcha word games like the absolute smartest of 12 year olds. Silly me for giving you another chance to not act in bad faith.Well if that's what you meant why didn't you say so...
With our reduced completion rates, our middle is required to make more tackles over 80 minutes. Until we fix that we can't really judge.Why is it so bad? The only differences to our middle defence this year are Hodgson, Hopgood and that new defence coach Steve Anotelli. Have those 3 ruined our defence?
(Matterson has spent time in the middle and the edge just like last year so didn’t include that as a difference).
Here's some tips I came across that might help your posts and replies more effectively communicate the points (beyond the mere argumentative or contrary) that you are trying to make in future. You're welcome...Because I was replying to your comment in a colloquial manner. Since you had a showed a lack of comprehension relative to my previous points I figured it was better to use language you seemed to be able to understand.
Probably fair for you to ask yourself these questions when you read anyone's posts than dismiss it out of hand. Most of these merkins have something worthwhile to add and before dismissing it with ad hominem attacks you should ask:Here's some tips I came across that might help your posts and replies more effectively communicate the points (beyond the mere argumentative or contrary) that you are trying to make in future. You're welcome...
Consider your claim and supporting evidence and draw out the implications:
- Why am I saying this here?
- What point am I trying to make?
- What does this evidence show?
Probably fair for you to ask yourself these questions when you read anyone's posts than dismiss it out of hand. Most of these merkins have something worthwhile to add and before dismissing it with ad hominem attacks you should ask:
Great advice mate. Make sure you check in with the mental health thread and put merkins on ignore if you don't like their posts.
- Why are they saying this here?
- What point are they trying to make?
- What does this evidence show?
You're the one using my material, almost word for word...
Josh must be on his own shit list then.Josh thinks he's his own biggest critic. Obviously hasn't read this forum: https://www.parraeels.com.au/news/2023/05/03/im-my-own-biggest-critic-josh-hodgson/
It's a shame because if he did he would discover that you are his biggest apologist.Josh thinks he's his own biggest critic. Obviously hasn't read this forum: https://www.parraeels.com.au/news/2023/05/03/im-my-own-biggest-critic-josh-hodgson/