What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Journalists making sh*t up?

RazorRam0n

Juniors
Messages
2,027
have u had any feedback from Wayne about yr comments abt him changing and his personall life? Any response to you revealing Ikin (Wayne's son-on-law) as yr source?

-Dean B
No I haven't. I spoke to Ben beforehand and he allowed me to say his name.

yet this still continues to get ignored.
 

no name

Referee
Messages
20,720
http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport...t/news-story/39edf9227e64e086884407d5223d8437

What a surprise.. Now Darren Lockyer validates Kent and Ikins claim lol

What now Bennett?
Also the benji is horrified thing which kent claims was 100% accurate is not supported by Lockyer.
how can he support it if he probably wasn't there when ikin saw it?
So Lockyer doesn't believe that he is a bad trainer like Kent had us believe.
based on what?

and again kent didn't say it, he was quoting ikin.
So you are saying Locky's article validates Kent's quotes of Ikin quoting Benji because Lockyer probably wasn't there when Ikin was.
This is the same article that says 'Talking to people at the Broncos, Anthony is by no means a terrible trainer.'
You have an odd definition of what validate means.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
36,913
what does it mean then? what does an extra 5% mean?

lockyer knows the context is accusing milford of cutting corners and not being in the best shape he can be. does "not terrible" dispell this? hardly champ

everyone can see milford's physique could be improved...

Jesus GW, how many alts do you have?

Do you get a thrill out of all this shit posting?
 

RazorRam0n

Juniors
Messages
2,027
So you are saying Locky's article validates Kent's quotes of Ikin quoting Benji because Lockyer probably wasn't there when Ikin was.
This is the same article that says 'Talking to people at the Broncos, Anthony is by no means a terrible trainer.'
You have an odd definition of what validate means.

you're using this as some sort of proof of conclusion?

how can he support it if he probably wasn't there when ikin saw it?
lol

it's as black and white as it appears, if lockyer wasn't there when ikin had that conversation with marshall, how can he possibly debunk it?

simple he can't. he's only validated that there are training concerns with milford.
 

Paullyboy

Coach
Messages
10,471
First things first - If you can't read between the lines here and see that Lockyer is desperately wanting to stick up for a fellow Bronco, but having to concede that Milf is a shit trainer, then there isn't much help for you.

Secondly - why the hell are we talking about this still? There are probably a heap of shit trainers in the NRL.
 

RazorRam0n

Juniors
Messages
2,027
First things first - If you can't read between the lines here and see that Lockyer is desperately wanting to stick up for a fellow Bronco, but having to concede that Milf is a shit trainer, then there isn't much help for you.

Secondly - why the hell are we talking about this still? There are probably a heap of shit trainers in the NRL.


Because Bennett cronies hold onto the myth that he can do no wrong
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,528
While we are on journos there's a funny spat developing in uk between Garry schofield and David Fifita. Schofield isn't known for being shy in his opinions lol.

Schofield "
Boasting to former golden boot winner that you've had a good half against Leigh is akin to screeming in USain bolts face that you can outpace your nan over 30 metres

Think we can safely say he is not the sharpest tool in the shed

He is an impact player who plays when he wants to play. He's inconsistent and when he's not on his game he's little more than a waste of space.

ONe day he might actually fulfill his potential "

Ouch!
 

Latest posts

Top