RazorRam0n
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,027
I thought Ikin wasn't talking to Bennett due to the affair issue.
So not sure why people are falling for GWs claims in this thread.
this.
there's far more to it than people realise.
I thought Ikin wasn't talking to Bennett due to the affair issue.
So not sure why people are falling for GWs claims in this thread.
I think I'm in the minority, but I don't mind Kent.
This battle between Bennett and Paul Kent looks likely to escalate to a full blown war if this hostile behaviour continues, which is not a good look for the sport of Rugby League.
It's just 2 people with ego's & over inflated opinions of their own importance with handbags at 10 paces.This battle between Bennett and Paul Kent looks likely to escalate to a full blown war if this hostile behaviour continues, which is not a good look for the sport of Rugby League.
Other than having red hair, what does Weidler have going for him in the fighting department?I'd have said Te'o should have put one on his chin but Te'o can't fight.
Other than having red hair, what does Weidler have going for him in the fighting department?
Te'o would clean him up.
Copy and paste the story for us, we don't pay for that garbage.
Jesus, is there any unique accounts on LU anymore??
http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport...t/news-story/39edf9227e64e086884407d5223d8437
What a surprise.. Now Darren Lockyer validates Kent and Ikins claim lol
What now Bennett?
Doesn't look like he's validating Kent and Ikin at all.
Kent "Benji is horrified at Milford's training"
Lockyer "Talking to people at Broncos, Milford is not a terrible trainer"
How do you work out that these are the same thing?
WTF was that wishy washy shit from Lockyer?
Is he a bad trainer or not?
If you're going to write an article about it, come out and say it, otherwise there is no point to the article.
Kent can't claim that as his evidence that he was right.