Judiciary Charges 2019

[Vic Mackey]

So hitting a bloke 0.3 seconds late is worse then smashing a bloke who never touches the ball

Never change NRL

 

[yobbo84]

I can only image the reaction from Buzz and on here if Sam did what Tetevano did, or Cordner did. He's being run out of the game. If we win the competition I could see him retiring immediately or going back to the UK.

 

[edabomb]

Burgess gets more punishment for a hair pull than he did for knocking Moylan senseless. Righto NRL.

 

[BranVan3000]

So NRL have given the thumbs up to bumper bars to the throat? Guess Sam should have gone with that

 

[Frailty]

I can only image the reaction from Buzz and on here if Sam did what Tetevano did, or Cordner did. He's being run out of the game. If we win the competition I could see him retiring immediately or going back to the UK.

Yeah... Sam is being run out of the game. That's why he wasn't suspended for attempting to decapitate Matt Moylan.

Sam needs to take responsibility for how he plays the game. Don't blame the NRL.

 

[skeepe]

I can only image the reaction from Buzz and on here if Sam did what Tetevano did, or Cordner did. He's being run out of the game. If we win the competition I could see him retiring immediately or going back to the UK.

He could have.... you know....
just not pulled Smith’s hair.

I mean, it was a good hard tackle. Why the hair pull? Why?

 

[yobbo84]

He could have.... you know....
just not pulled Smith’s hair.

I mean, it was a good hard tackle. Why the hair pull? Why?

That's not my point. My point is, why was Sam's innocuous incident charged, yet Tetevano's and Cordner not? Because he's Sam, that's why.

If Sam had put the bumper bar up to Cronk, who went off for a HIA, and Cordner had pulled hair, do you think the result would have been the same? Of course not.

 

[TheFrog]

That's not my point. My point is, why was Sam's innocuous incident charged, yet Tetevano's and Cordner not?

Dunno about Tetevano, but Cordner is the Australian captain. Can't have Australian captains getting in strife.

 

[Timmah]

That's not my point. My point is, why was Sam's innocuous incident charged, yet Tetevano's and Cordner not? Because he's Sam, that's why.

If Sam had put the bumper bar up to Cronk, who went off for a HIA, and Cordner had pulled hair, do you think the result would have been the same? Of course not.

It was charged because it's contrary conduct.

Ordinarily, Sam would've just got a pissy fine somewhere between $1150 and $2k (depending on his priors). But, as per the indication on the charge sheet, he lost his eligibility for fines because he is frequently charged by the MRC and on 3 occasions this year, has either pled guilty or been found guilty.

If Cordner had pulled someone's hair, he'd have been charged with Grade 1 Contrary Conduct and fined $1,350 with an early plea (20% loading for the dangerous throw late last year which was a non-similar prior). He hasn't been charged this season so would be eligible to be fined.

 

[yobbo84]

It was charged because it's contrary conduct.

Ordinarily, Sam would've just got a pissy fine somewhere between $1150 and $2k (depending on his priors). But, as per the indication on the charge sheet, he lost his eligibility for fines because he is frequently charged by the MRC and on 3 occasions this year, has either pled guilty or been found guilty.

If Cordner had pulled someone's hair, he'd have been charged with Grade 1 Contrary Conduct and fined $1,350 with an early plea (20% loading for the dangerous throw late last year which was a non-similar prior). He hasn't been charged this season so would be eligible to be fined.

Naive much? If you think Cordner would've got a Grade 1 Contrary Conduct for that you're having a laugh. Likewise if you think Sam would've got off for sending the opposition halfback to a HIA for a forearm to the jaw.

 

[Vic Mackey]

Naive much? If you think Cordner would've got a Grade 1 Contrary Conduct for that you're having a laugh. Likewise if you think Sam would've got off for sending the opposition halfback to a HIA for a forearm to the jaw.

Well to be fair he got off for a coat hanger on Matt Moylan who then missed a week with Concussion. Similar to the one he did on SBW the week before the 2014 GF which he wasn’t even charged for

 

[yobbo84]

Well to be fair he got off for a coat hanger on Matt Moylan who then missed a week with Concussion. Similar to the one he did on SBW the week before the 2014 GF which he wasn’t even charged for

Thanks Vic, I always look for your unbiased opinions on the Rabbitohs.

 

[Vic Mackey]

Thanks Vic, I always look for your unbiased opinions on the Rabbitohs.

Not really sure what aspect of that was biased, post was stating facts.

Perhaps your red and green eyes are showing through here?

 

[Someguy]

Thanks Vic, I always look for your unbiased opinions on the Rabbitohs.

That’s it attack the guy who earlier in the thread questioning the roosters player hitting a bloke without the ball! Think he is the voice of common sense and not bias as you sarcastically claim

 

[SBD82]

Thanks Vic, I always look for your unbiased opinions on the Rabbitohs.

I’m with you mate.

In my experience, only a supporter of a club can give a truly unbiased opinion on the actions of their players.

 

[mave]

How many weeks for Fainu with the vicious legs tackle last night ?

 

[siv]

While the MRC charge report is not published

And the MRC process and review committee not held to account for NON or incorrect low charge situations

There will be a under current of precieved bias and corruption

 

[Vic Mackey]

1 week for a swinging arm that collects a bloke flush on the jaw and knocks him out

MRC needs a total overhaul

 

[yobbo84]

Pulling hair = 1 week

Swinging arm that knocks a bloke out cold = 1 week

Seems legit.

 

[yobbo84]

1 week for a swinging arm that collects a bloke flush on the jaw and knocks him out

MRC needs a total overhaul

Luke Garner should buy the ammunition.