Never said Hales. Roy looks solidish.
I know you didn't say Hales. But Roy is little different from Hales.
They're clubbers, hitting the ball hard with the bat gripped in hard hands.
They would love to be test quality batsmen I presume, but they're not. I wouldn't be surprised if they had little idea compared to test quality where their off stump was, but they hit the ball. Even out in front of them.
And in ODI, they're not even as reliable as Martin Guptill. But they have a team role, and they execute it more than well enough for England to win.
While it may sound ludicrous to many, the best player in a broad role is not always the best team member in a more specialised role within the XI, the old adage of a champion team beats a team of champions is very much true for a reason.
The blueprint is no longer about finding the 5 best batsmen, 1 best allrounder and keeper, and 4 best bowlers. Now it is about picking the best XI.
Look at Parraboy's team again for example, he is bringing 3 quality bowlers where one bats a bit, with Maxwell, Head*, Stoinis and MMarsh - giving 4 options to get through 20 overs. Even a batsman versus a spud wants a sighter. The more sighters, the lower the E/R - plus it makes it easier for the captain not to count overs entirely accurately.
And these 4 guys are not even the best batsmen in Australia, Khawaja and Finch would certainly have claims before them. But they hit the ball hard when they bat, as well as bowl, and Maxwell brings a fielding element too.
Why do you think England bowl Joe Root early every game that Stokes misses when replaced by Hales?
*Head for Finch opening with Carey in the middle order is a change I would consider making in PB's team. But I get where he is going with in the bowling department, plus Finch isn't the best fielder by a long way, so PB's team is still very good and reasonable in my opinion. I just think Finch - while having been too slow of late, is still scoring runs and I'd be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater.