Dykes was dally m five eighth of the year when we signed him and we were in desperate need of a half.
It was a massive signing and I don't think that the club could be blamed for signing him.
I reckon it is a potentially good analogy.
Dykes was a great great signing. And he turned out to be a dud. I don;t reckon anyone could have expected that.
It some ways, Sandow has the potential to go the same way. Questions over his off field mentality; whether he will fit the club's style; whether he is the organiser we want.
Had to sign dykes at the time imo. Had to sign sandow even more this time around.
There ar eno guarantees when you sign someone. But he was the best avaialable option by a long, long way so let's hope for the best
It was a massive signing and I don't think that the club could be blamed for signing him.
I reckon it is a potentially good analogy.
Dykes was a great great signing. And he turned out to be a dud. I don;t reckon anyone could have expected that.
It some ways, Sandow has the potential to go the same way. Questions over his off field mentality; whether he will fit the club's style; whether he is the organiser we want.
Had to sign dykes at the time imo. Had to sign sandow even more this time around.
There ar eno guarantees when you sign someone. But he was the best avaialable option by a long, long way so let's hope for the best