undertaker
Coach
- Messages
- 11,074
And watch, something will happen next week in the Grand Final and it will not be ruled upon. We've been waiting for a referee f**k up to cost a team the premiership and I have a feeling that could be next Sunday.
But imagine if that happened to the Roosters? I'd probably lose it :lol:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6aA-aqDNJY
Well, I posted this video earlier as an example of what current referees lack today compared to years gone by. It was also a Preliminary Final (a.k.a. Grand Final Qualifier). Greg McCallum was one of the best referees in the games history, far better than Hollywood Harrigan (and without the media attention Harrigan had), AND he did not have the benefit of video refs back then. Now, most refs are too scared to make big decisions because of media scrutiny. Biggest example is in Golden Point where teams are never penalised for being offside with field-goal attempts.
Unfortunately, I see the current crop of refs have been greatly influenced by Harrigan by trying to keep the game as free-flowing as possible whilst letting all these manoevres that deserve to be penalised go unpenalised. The problem with the two-referee system is 1) there isn't enough quality in the current refereeing ranks to have double the amount of referees, which is required in the 2 ref system and 2) the WAY the 2 ref system is implemented.
Elaborating on that second point (and I think you will understand what I'm trying to say), in a half of footy, one team is reffed by one ref and the other team by the other ref. This is a mistake as most of the time, as I have observed of since it was implemented in 2009, one team gets away with far more crap than the other (mostly in the wrestling and keeping the 10m). If the 2-ref system is maintained, it should be amended so that the more better, experienced ref is the one "refereeing" the game, keeping the 10m and the other ref is the pocket ref.
Last edited: