Disagree completely.
That tackle could have a home in the NFL, but even then he would have been penalised.
The shoulder charge is a reckless tackle. You have no control over what happens after contact.
It was a headclash? Had he have attempted to tackle the bloke, their heads would not have collided.
Under the rules though which allow shoulder charges it was a perfectly legitimate hit. I can't fault Burgess for it.
Personally I hate shoulder charges and think they should be banned. They are cheap shots and reckless. I have seen guys have their jaws broken because some f**kwit flies in from an angle(i.e. blindsides, which is what most shoulder charges are about) for a shoulder charge and launches their head straight into the ballrunner's face.
It takes a lot more skill to pull off a proper tackle with arms, and is better to watch.
You watch some of Edwards's or Nigel Plum's bellringers and compare them to Burgess's yesterday and I'll bet you find the former more impressive.
The best tackle I've seen was a cracker by Lincoln Withers on a rampaging Matt Utai where's he lifted him up front on and sat him on his arse. Those are the tackles we should be celebrating.