Willow said:
The NRL deemed that the club didn't do enough. Garry Hughes was sacked by the club for failing to enforce the code of conduct. Mortimer fell on his sword. Ask the club if they thought the NRL was in the wrong.
So on the one hand the NRL and the club disagreed with the punishment (hence the NRL stepping in, according to you). On the other the club was fine with the extra punishment the NRL decided to dish out.
Doesn't make sense to me.
My opinion on these things is that the NRL should stay out of these issues and let the clubs dish out punishment to their players, except on very extreme situations. Now, at first, the '04 Coffs affair seemed like an extreme situation. But if Gallop had acted appropriately and waited (like he's doing now) then he would've realised that this drama was not unlike most of the other dramas that engulf almost every other club in the comp. The Bulldogs dished out heavy fines, and club legends lost their jobs.
I started in on this (again) because some other Dogs fans were letting their frustrations be known over the huge discrepancy between the NRL's handling of this and other situations and the Coffs affair. And I get a little pissed off when supporters of other clubs who know three fifths of f*ck all about what Dogs fans went through (and what they still go through), chime in with 'get over it', and the like. Or even worse: 'Gallop and the NRL handled the Coffs affair perfectly'.
Gallop is doing the right thing now. Good on him for learning from his mistakes. But it still pisses me and other Dogs fans off, and sometimes you'll still hear about.
(The last couple of paragraphs weren't directed at you, Williow.)