Least controversial club of the year award.

[gunnamatta bay]

Who will win this prestigious prize. My club, the sharks, were going great guns till birdgate.

 

[Brownie.Kougari]

Nothing much has happened in Brissy after Bennet (unless you count Locky's knee but that's not really controversy).

Manly's been flying under the radar as always.

 

[Grail]

Knights have been pretty quiet from memory.

 

[Johns Magic]

Knights have been pretty quiet from memory.

Seu Seu

 

[gunnamatta bay]

Nothing much has happened in Brissy after Bennet (unless you count Locky's knee but that's not really controversy).

Manly's been flying under the radar as always.

yeah I think 'controversey' has to be defined but the list is nearly endless.

 

[scuzzi]

considering the media exposure on the Broncos i'd say they are the least controversial, also the warriors from memory

 

[greenos]

Dogs?

 

[hitman82]

Michael Crockett's current court case probably disqualifies us.

 

[Frank_Grimes]

Who will win this prestigious prize. My club, the sharks, were going great guns till birdgate.

Gallen and his facial claw made sure the Sharks got off to a great start.

Pretty much every club has had some controversy this year:

Broncos - Bennett leaving?
Raiders - Carney
Eels - Tim Smith and Jarryd Hayne
Panthers- Luke Lewis and Frank Pritchard
Bulldogs - $BW
Dragons - Gasnier and Nathan Brown's stoush with Melbourne
Warriors - Crockett and his rape case
Storm- The grapple continued and their stoush with Nathan Brown
Souths - Luke Lewis, Craig Wing and Peter Holmes A Court
Roosters - Riley Brown and his shoulder charge
Sharks - Gallen and Bird
Titans - Daniel Conn? or Laffranchi and his rape case
Cowboys - Murray leaving, then pushed
Tigers - Laffranchi and his rape case? Hodgson leaving?
Knights - ?
Manly - ?

It would be a battle between Broncos, Manly, Knights and the Tigers IMO.

 

[scuzzi]

true, forgot about that

 

[Roosterphin1]

Roosters - Riley Brown and his shoulder charge
quote]

LOL:lol: What the perfectly legal tackle of which I have seen at least a hundred more of this season.

 

[Frank_Grimes]

Roosters - Riley Brown and his shoulder charge

LOL:lol: What the perfectly legal tackle of which I have seen at least a hundred more of this season.

Was it not controversial? Idiot.

 

[Shorty]

Broncos have been plenty controversial they've got a player that may go to jail(Lacey?).
Souths?

 

[ucantseeme]

Manly would be a shoe in.

Though the Tigers haven't had much negative off field stuff, except when Benji got into some push and shove at a pub but that wasnt his fault.

 

[Frank_Grimes]

Broncos have been plenty controversial they've got a player that may go to jail(Lacey?).
Souths?

Didn't the incident with Lacey happen last year? I haven't kept up to date if any court hearings have been held this year though.

The losing streak, and the dirty laundry being aired between PHAC and Souths management should see enough controversy for them.

 

[Shorty]

Hmm maybe it was lol.
I guess it depends on the level of controversy as well Dogs/Sharks/Raiders latest controversies are larger than others.

Manly didn't have that much,except that Cow's blood thing.

 

[El Diablo]

Didn't the incident with Lacey happen last year?

didn't stop you putting Laffranchi in with the Titans and Tigers

why would you even associate it with the Titans :?

some of the so called incidents on your list aren't incidents at all

 

[Stagger eel]

Tulon.

 

[Roosterphin1]

Was it not controversial? Idiot.

hardly caused by the Roosters....idiot

 

[Frank_Grimes]

didn't stop you putting Laffranchi in with the Titans and Tigers

Inserted because his case was heard this year. Did you miss that?

why would you even associate it with the Titans :?

You do know he plays for them now. A player from the Titans involved in a rape case brings the Titans into the story by association. One could argue that the Tigers shouldn't be associated with the story as he has no links to them anymore.

some of the so called incidents on your list aren't incidents at all

Where did I state they were incidents? You really just like to argue for the sake of it don't you?