ANTiLAG
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,014
So its okay for people to discuss the individual contributions of Lockyer and Johns to their team's results but nerves get touched when someone throws Thurston into the works. As a Queensland fan who was watched 30 years of origin - I have never seen a half of Thurstons quality running the ship. His dominance, spark and creativity is the best I have seen in a maroon jumper. Langer was lost without Lewis beside him in 92-94 - Thurston without Lockyer did not change his play, plan or control - and it worked.
This whole Qld is such a dominant team - yeah it is now - but it was a losing team when Thurston came into it. Joey came into the most dominant NSW team in the 90's AND THEY LOST REPEATEDLY under his guidance. He was benched and dropped for Toovey and Kimmorley both. It was not his stellar play that caused this to happen.
Qld could have very lost in 2008 if Thurston had not played as well as he did. People can say "Joey carried NSW" but I get attacked for saying "Thurston guided Qld" - that is the halves job isn't it? To guide the team?
Very inconsistent reasoning used in this thread by some people - and I love the responses when I use the people's reasoning back on them. Priceless.
This whole Qld is such a dominant team - yeah it is now - but it was a losing team when Thurston came into it. Joey came into the most dominant NSW team in the 90's AND THEY LOST REPEATEDLY under his guidance. He was benched and dropped for Toovey and Kimmorley both. It was not his stellar play that caused this to happen.
Qld could have very lost in 2008 if Thurston had not played as well as he did. People can say "Joey carried NSW" but I get attacked for saying "Thurston guided Qld" - that is the halves job isn't it? To guide the team?
Very inconsistent reasoning used in this thread by some people - and I love the responses when I use the people's reasoning back on them. Priceless.