dogslife
Coach
- Messages
- 18,985
They named a street after the vacant space between Lockyer's inside defender and his outside defender?There's only one way to vote in this thread, and that's the...
They named a street after the vacant space between Lockyer's inside defender and his outside defender?There's only one way to vote in this thread, and that's the...
They named a street after the vacant space between Lockyer's inside defender and his outside defender?
They named a street after the vacant space between Lockyer's inside defender and his outside defender?
Great insight.
Maybe people have a different opinion to yours amd believe what they SEE, not what they are told.
I guess like people telling me Lockyer is the best of all time. But I don't believe it because despite being a bloody good player, he was defensively suspect and needed constant protection in games for it.
To be considered even close to the best, you have to have the all round arsenal. Lockyer does not come close when you consider defence.
The more I read about people fapping on about johns the more apparent it becomes just how over rated he was.
Some people will just believe anything they're told.
Remember the tackle on devere in soo??
I know you do.
Do you think johns or jt could have made that tackle?
Great defence is not confined to front on tackling. It involves defusing bombs and cover defence as well.
You and many others fail to see this because you're to stupid.
:lol:
Do I remember 1 tackle? :crazy:
You really are just a simpleton aren't you.
"The rest of the world is crazy, it's not me!" :lol:
Keep punching away Chumpy. You'll deck one of those shadows soon.....
QLDers often forget that defence is half the game.
Generally one set of six you tackle, one set of six you attack.
Cue
50% or thereabouts, has anyone seen Jarrod Croker...............................
:lol:
Do I remember 1 tackle? :crazy:
You really are just a simpleton aren't you.
"The rest of the world is crazy, it's not me!" :lol:
Keep punching away Chumpy. You'll deck one of those shadows soon.....
Interesting rationale.
We have many people stating their opinion that JT & Johns are very, very close. Yet Lockyer is behind both of them. You tell all of those, some who have been watching the game for 40+ years that they?re wrong because they?re told to say that. By who I'm not sure.
Yet you know better because?...................
Can we apply that very rationale to your opinions?
By who you ask?
Channel 9.
What do you and face beaver know anyway.
Both your clubs merged with other clubs.
Your opinion means shit
Fyi im not the only person on earth that disagrees with you.
Get a grip you idiot.
Remember the tackle on devere in soo??
I know you do.
Do you think johns or jt could have made that tackle?
Great defence is not confined to front on tackling. It involves defusing bombs and cover defence as well.
You and many others fail to see this because you're to stupid.
And here I was thinking the defensive deficiencies of the likes of Sandow, Moses and Brooks was an issue.Halves tend to win the game in attack, not defence. But why bother having a discussion when you can be facetious?
I here I was thinking the defensive deficiencies of the likes of Sandow, Moses and Brooks was an issue.
Apparently not?