What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Lockyer v Thurston

Who was/is better?


  • Total voters
    88

Trent91

Juniors
Messages
47
The Bronco hate is very strong in here.

Had no idea just how under rated locky is down south.

He sure pissed off plenty down there over his career.

Just for the record how well would johns go defending at fullback?

Last time I checked champ Johns didn't play fullback, so that's a moot point.
 

DiegoNT

First Grade
Messages
9,378
The Bronco hate is very strong in here.

Had no idea just how under rated locky is down south.

He sure pissed off plenty down there over his career.

Just for the record how well would johns go defending at fullback?

How would lockyer go defending at hooker
 

papabear

Juniors
Messages
973
How would lockyer go defending at hooker

no where near as well as johns at fullback.

It is not people from nsw underrating lockyer, it is people from everywhere outside of brisbane agreeing that thurston is/was better then him.
 

Nice Beaver

First Grade
Messages
5,920
Johns lacked consistency, and often went missing in games, he is also a confessed drug user admitting to using banned substances throughout his career. There is no such thing as the perfect player, all players including the greats have deficiencies. When people lean a certain way they tend to view these a lot more harshly and in an over exaggerated manner, which I'm probably guilty of as well with Johns.

Sorry, but completely disagree on Johns going missing.

As for drug user.....I'd be careful throwing that around in this thread....at least Johns admitted it.

And of course there is no such thing as the "perfect player". But I'll take a player who can do more than one who had limits in certain areas.
 

Barkley

Bench
Messages
2,576
I couldn't imagine how hard it was for Locky to play with a team full of rep players throughout his career.
 

Bronco18

Juniors
Messages
1,072
They were not even defensively, your broncos bias is laughable...so so laughable.

Next you will be telling me alan langer was better then peter sterling, or gordon tallis was the best second rower ever? Or has he gone down hill now that he dared criticize the deity wayne bennett.

Oh wow, some fans are biased. Would it be so hard to contemplate fans being biased against a Broncos player - not exactly the League's most loved club...

Play the ball not the man, these debates are tricky enough without muddying the waters with rubbish ulterior motives.
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
In conclusion... every non Broncos fan agrees that JT is a class above Locky.

And only Broncos fans think Lockyer is untouchable and better than both JT and Joey.
 

papabear

Juniors
Messages
973
Oh wow, some fans are biased. Would it be so hard to contemplate fans being biased against a Broncos player - not exactly the League's most loved club...

Play the ball not the man, these debates are tricky enough without muddying the waters with rubbish ulterior motives.

Meh everyone hates pretty much every club that isnt there own.

I personally think ricky stuart and mal meninga are the next best players behind johns. But I will happily admit that is my own bias.

Broncos fans seem to think they can get on a mission and change what is blindingly obviious to everyone else.
 

Big Pete

Referee
Messages
29,116
lol at linnett and cooper being minders...

If cooper didn't play off thurston in attack so well (the line etc that he runs) he wouldn't be in the side. He is certainly not there for his defence.

TC also ran well off of Lockyer, it wasn't as if he was a David Stagg type of player who was picked solely to make tackles. Similar can be said of Gavin Cooper. Just because he can run good lines off of JT, doesn't mean he doesn't take care of him defensively. And that's especially true of Linnett, who doesn't offer much else than making metres inside his own half of the field ala Ash Graham.

You've been whinging about bias through out this thread. Yet, you're having a go at Lockyer for having TC besides him (like it's unique in Rugby League) when JT has Cooper and Linnett either side covering for him.

It isn't like he spent seven seasons playing a different defensive role either. He's had his entire career to get himself right on that left defensive edge and he still struggles.
 

THE CHAMP

First Grade
Messages
8,359
The lockyer threads are great for proving just how much butthurt Darren lockyer and the Brisbane Broncos have caused throughout the league.

Epic stuff.
 

papabear

Juniors
Messages
973
TC also ran well off of Lockyer, it wasn't as if he was a David Stagg type of player who was picked solely to make tackles. Similar can be said of Gavin Cooper. Just because he can run good lines off of JT, doesn't mean he doesn't take care of him defensively. And that's especially true of Linnett, who doesn't offer much else than making metres inside his own half of the field ala Ash Graham.

You've been whinging about bias through out this thread. Yet, you're having a go at Lockyer for having TC besides him (like it's unique in Rugby League) when JT has Cooper and Linnett either side covering for him.

It isn't like he spent seven seasons playing a different defensive role either. He's had his entire career to get himself right on that left defensive edge and he still struggles.

By your own example, if the broncos didnt have a tonie carroll defending next to lockyer and were left with a gavin cooper type equivalent they wouldn't have had anywhere near the same success they had with TC.

TC >>>>> Gavin Cooper.

Like the thurston and lockyer debate, its due to his defence being so so so much better.
 

Latest posts

Top