Logos are geting worse

[Lambretta]

Hahahah raiders got zero votes :lol:

I bet if all the people that voted were asked to rank the teams logo's 1-16 very few, if any would have the Raiders as the worst logo.

In fact I bet it would be in many people's top 10. Yes, I realise that there are only 16 teams - but I'd put their colours and logo mid table. They're actually pretty decent.

 

[firechild]

I bet if all the people that voted were asked to rank the teams logo's 1-16 very few, if any would have the Raiders as the worst logo.

In fact I bet it would be in many people's top 10. Yes, I realise that there are only 16 teams - but I'd put their colours and logo mid table. They're actually pretty decent.

But it's not about good or bad. The colours and logo have almost no relevance to the heritage or area and therefore they would have to come in close to last. Titans logo would be up there but the colours have meaning, Cowboys, Panthers, Sea Eagles, Sharks, Dragons, Warriors, Rabbitohs and Eels, even Broncos to some extent all have a logo that has a connection with the area. Even the Storm ties in with the fact that the weather is miserable in Melbourne (though I find it unlikely that it was the idea behind the logo).

 

[Lambretta]

But it's not about good or bad. The colours and logo have almost no relevance to the heritage or area and therefore they would have to come in close to last.

If that's the criteria then Canberra would need to be the Canberra Compromises, or the Canberra Civil Servants to get a vote.

Maybe the Canberra "turn left here and it's anyone's guess which direction you'll end up heading in" would also be relevant.

 

[Lambretta]

Even the Storm ties in with the fact that the weather is miserable in Melbourne (though I find it unlikely that it was the idea behind the logo).

Sydney has far more Storms than Melbourne. The Melbourne overcast or Melbourne drizzle would be more in keeping with their actual climate.

 

[firechild]

Sydney has far more Storms than Melbourne. The Melbourne overcast or Melbourne drizzle would be more in keeping with their actual climate.

True but given they have a lot more crap weather, the only way to convey this as a formidable logo is as a storm. There is still an element of connection.

 

[Loudstrat]

There are f*cking storms everywhere.

But it's not about good or bad. The colours and logo have almost no relevance to the heritage or area and therefore they would have to come in close to last. Titans logo would be up there but the colours have meaning, Cowboys, Panthers, Sea Eagles, Sharks, Dragons, Warriors, Rabbitohs and Eels, even Broncos to some extent all have a logo that has a connection with the area. Even the Storm ties in with the fact that the weather is miserable in Melbourne (though I find it unlikely that it was the idea behind the logo).

How does the Broncos logo reflect their area ffs?

 

[no name]

There are f*cking storms everywhere.


How does the Broncos logo reflect their area ffs?

You obviously haven't been to Brisbane, wild Broncos roam through the Queen St Mall.

 

[AlwaysGreen]

So if your logo has to reflect your area why aren't Manly called the f**kwits?

 

[Diesel]

And what does the GC have to do with Titans?

 

[eozsmiles]

So if your logo has to reflect your area why aren't Manly called the f**kwits?

Because we'd then have the Penrith smack dealers, the Canterbury gun runners, and the Parra bikies going around.

Not to mention the South Sydney media personalities and the Gold Coast s**ts.

And then the comp would be a laughing stock.

 

[WayneBennett]

The Cronulla Rioters