I seem to have the total opposite opinion on these two that everyone else does.
Luai: This guy is actually a f*#king gun. He, Munster and Walker are neck and neck the best 3 five eighths in the game. Deadly running game, terrific ball player, great short kicking game and I never see the dude miss a tackle. I get that hes a pretty unlikable dude, and I guess that effects peoples opinions on his game. Put it this way, if Penrith were to lose he or Clearly for a finals series theyd be much better off losing Nathan. Its been shown that what he brings can be replaced, I dont think they can bring another Luai up too easily. Anyone else find it a coincidence a 30 year old journeyman in Sorensen is suddenly a gun after he replaces Kikau? Its because of who is passing them the ball.
Edwards: Has become the most over rated player in the game bar none. Look the guy can play, but hes nowhere near what gets made out. I find it hilarious when people call for him to replace Tedesco for NSW. What exactly will he do better? Teddy is still making 200ms a game, which is all the Edwards fan club talks about. He doesnt bring anything in attack and I see him have one clanger mistake every game (tonight with the horrendous pass to Turuva on a kick return). He would be smart to stay at Penrith on $500-$600k for his career. If he goes to somewhere like the Dragons or Knights on big money he'd get blasted for being 'under whelming' as a big money player in a poor team and end up in the ESL in 3 years.