Make up of the side for Round1

[Quigs]

If Seymour is not ready for round 1 Kearney will be the half..at Barret's request as he does not think Green is ready for that position in first grade. Kearney has been training at both half & full back.

I appreciate Old Shintaros comments - they are much appreciated but
I am greatly concerned from what I read above is that Trent is having a major say in who is in the team.

The stinking Stains had this problem with the senior members picking the sides when Naffin' was coaching. Apparently Gaz and co picked the half combo's - now I could be wrong.

But I don't want that happening in our club. I hope the Senior Coach has the say of who plays where, whose up who and whose not payin'

Cheers
Declared Idiot #88
Quigs

 

[Frenzy.]

I appreciate Old Shintaros comments - they are much appreciated but
I am greatly concerned from what I read above is that Trent is having a major say in who is in the team.

The stinking Stains had this problem with the senior members picking the sides when Naffin' was coaching. Apparently Gaz and co picked the half combo's - now I could be wrong.

But I don't want that happening in our club. I hope the Senior Coach has the say of who plays where, whose up who and whose not payin'

Cheers
Declared Idiot #88
Quigs

It's the ghost of Nodness Past Quigs.

Some of the scourge lives on.

Noddy's passed Trent the frikkin ball and now Trent owns it!!

 

[spider]

stuart makes the decisions on who plays where

players may be asked for advice, but no player would dictate to him who plays, let alone where

its laughable to think it would occur

its not rocket science - you only have to recall our last game to see how green performs in the top grade

 

[Boatharbour]

1.Kearney
2.Misi
3.Pommery
4.Covell
5.Ferguson
6.Barrett
7.Green
8.Ross
9.Huges
10.Douglas
11.Gallen
12.Williams
13.Tupou
14.Snowden
15.Norrie
16.Wright
17.Seu Seu

 

[shintaro]

not what im being told..battle of the sauces..tomato > pwns everything else

kearney hasnt impressed sticky at all with his trial form and word is ferguson is a chance to start ahead of him at fullback..green will be halfback

guess we have to play the waiting game *sits on hands*

I f Seymour is available for round 1, & theres a big chance that he will be, Kearney will be the fullback. Stuart & Flanagan are very happy with Kearney, particularly after the Newcastle trial where Flanagan was very happy with his efforts.

 

[Miller was a legend]

Would be fantastic if Seymour is available to play round one.

 

[Special K]

not what im being told..battle of the sauces..tomato > pwns everything else

kearney hasnt impressed sticky at all with his trial form and word is ferguson is a chance to start ahead of him at fullback..green will be halfback

guess we have to play the waiting game *sits on hands*

:lol:

Somebody shut this pleb up. The club obviously holds Kearney in high regard.. Infact they made him go to a sponsors night on friday night when i'm pretty sure they would of known of his ah "plans" for the night. Hardly think they would bother doing that if he wasn't in their own plans!

I seriously can't believe vossy is trying to out source THE source :lol:

Barrett and Kearney halves would be wicked.

 

[azzah72]

I appreciate Old Shintaros comments - they are much appreciated but
I am greatly concerned from what I read above is that Trent is having a major say in who is in the team.

The stinking Stains had this problem with the senior members picking the sides when Naffin' was coaching. Apparently Gaz and co picked the half combo's - now I could be wrong.

But I don't want that happening in our club. I hope the Senior Coach has the say of who plays where, whose up who and whose not payin'

Cheers
Declared Idiot #88
Quigs

See this is why I like you Quigs, smart guy, eyes open, not blinded by the not noddy brigade. Although not as, lets say, outspoken as I am, you have similar fears as me about trenty boy!

 

[BWNB]

So Buster will play on sat?

 

[coolumsharkie]

So Buster will play on sat?

Explicit form:

y1/n = x
​

Recursive form:

xk+1 = (xk + y / (xk)n-1) / 2 where y ³ 0 and n > 0
or y Î Â and n is odd, positive, and integer.
(for negative n, evaluate the above formula with n positive, then invert your answer).
​

Example: 21/3 = 1.259921049894...

iterationvaluex01.0000000000x11.5000000000x21.1944444444x31.2981416381x41.2424821566x51.2690093603x61.2554742937x71.2621680807x81.2588035314x91.2604812976x101.2596412994x201.2599207765x501.259921049894x

1.259921049894...
​

Piece a piss BWNB.

 

[Quigs]

You've got one too many zeros behind the 5 in the equation cools.

Lift your game son.

We can't afford to loose another space shuttle.

Cheers
Declared Idiot #88
Quigs

 

[BWNB]

Explicit form:

y1/n = x
​

Recursive form:

xk+1 = (xk + y / (xk)n-1) / 2 where y ³ 0 and n > 0
or y Î Â and n is odd, positive, and integer.
(for negative n, evaluate the above formula with n positive, then invert your answer).
​

Example: 21/3 = 1.259921049894...

iterationvaluex01.0000000000x11.5000000000x21.1944444444x31.2981416381x41.2424821566x51.2690093603x61.2554742937x71.2621680807x81.2588035314x91.2604812976x101.2596412994x201.2599207765x501.259921049894x

1.259921049894...
​

Piece a piss BWNB.

so thats a yes

 

[coolumsharkie]

It's recursive.

 

[Since 73]

Originally Posted by Quigs
I am greatly concerned from what I read above is that Trent is having a major say in who is in the team.

The stinking Stains had this problem with the senior members picking the sides when Naffin' was coaching.

Apparently Gaz and co picked the half combo's - now I could be wrong.

no - you're right Quigs.
That's why Brownie had to introduce the slap.

Sticky knows if Trent is gettin' a bit uppity he only has raise the hand & give him a smirk.
Trent pulls his head straight in.

Old brownie couldn't coach but he could train dogs like know one else.

 

[Vossy]

:lol:

Somebody shut this pleb up. The club obviously holds Kearney in high regard.. Infact they made him go to a sponsors night on friday night when i'm pretty sure they would of known of his ah "plans" for the night. Hardly think they would bother doing that if he wasn't in their own plans!

I seriously can't believe vossy is trying to out source THE source :lol:

Barrett and Kearney halves would be wicked.

:roll: "pleb" such a harsh word, f*ck are you 2 years old or what..ill take the masons word over your source anyday

 

[Frenzy.]

:roll: "pleb" such a harsh word, f*ck are you 2 years old or what..ill take the masons word over your source anyday

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You'd be silly to do that Vossy

 

[Special K]

:roll: "pleb" such a harsh word, f*ck are you 2 years old or what..ill take the masons word over your source anyday

:lol: that will do me

 

[zakspiders]

good to see you're commanding as much respect here as you do on other sites peachey/vossy!

 

[snoozer]

good to see you're commanding as much respect here as you do on other sites peachey/vossy!

hahahahaha!

 

[sleepy83]

To Whom It May Concern EG everybody that reads this forum
Vossy in the least amount of words I can use is an utter tool. He has no authority within the Masons, not now not ever. He goes from forum to forum sprouting incoherent rubbish that is neither right nor anywhere near correct. His so called sources in the Masons are just as
1 shocked that he posts saying we have news on team selections etc
2 that he uses the name of the Masons to illicit what he believes would be a better response.
3 he’s as much of a wanker now as he was 6 months ago.

As mentioned before all these posts do is make the best supporters club look bad eg dribblers