What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Manu Mau

Messages
11,677
I don't think you are an idiot.

Then you are a fool. I'm a total f**king idiot.

I get that it is a great nickname,

Then shut up and use it.

but I can't help to think that it is just wrong. What I think you are though, is just a 20th century boy who has been conditioned to put fun over what is right, like respect and sensitivity of people we don't know personally.

Not even close. I'm a 21st Century MAN with a beard and f**king mad hair who is also hilarious. I'm not gonna wring my hands and cry rivers of bullshit tears because someone chose to use a nickname linked to a pretty f**ked up section of history.

Hollywood Jesus isn't imaginary, he's just shaved the beard

Mel wishes he was as good looking as I am.



I'm sorry, mate, but that is hypocrisy.

Damned f**king straight, with not even a beard and fabulous hair to balance it out.
 

Casper The Ghost

First Grade
Messages
9,924
This thread has been trashed, f**ked, bogulated, done over, ruined, run over, soiled, rooted, shitted all over, written off, wrecked, damaged, crashed, crushed, destroyed, devastated, annihilated, shipwrecked, combobulated, smashed up, spat on, wasted, disrupted, messed, garbaged, junkafied, slaughtered, rubbed out, razored, quashed, squashed, invalidated, massacred, liquidated, murdered, finished off, expunged, exterminated, negated, deep throated, erased, labotomised, extirpated, abolished, abrogated, annulled, arsed, tarnished, scratched, wiped out, dynamited, terminated, demolished, wracked, blotted out, done in, set up, shot to pieces, hijacked, choked to death, hacked, shaken to the core, spooked, battered, assaulted, beaten, bruised, shattered, defaced, arse wiped, pummeled, pounded, bruised, raped, pillaged, plundered, pelted, mutilated, injured, lacerated, lambasted, lashed, disfigured, disabled, dashed, walloped, thrashed, smashed, contused, clobbered, buffeted, broken, beaten, blown up, bombed, withered, strangled, mutilated, detonated, stunted, torpedoed, broken up, decayed, fouled up, nullified, glitched up, nipped in the bud, messed up, frustrated, shaken up, traumatised, scraped, overwrought, scared, shot to pieces, taken out, discombobulated, given a funeral, ..............

Disclaimer: any repetition, grammar or spelling mistakes or lack of foresight & foreskin, etc, is due to moderators taking heavy ElephantJuice.
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,911
So you don't mind taking pot shots at people's religion but think a nickname is offensive? Interesting.

No I don't. Religion is fair game considering that throughout history it has been one of the chief motivators for many of the said atrocities. Also when one thinks about it, without a smidgen of any evidence or proof to validate any of it what so ever.

Jesus was a real person anyway. Not sure he spent much in Hollywood but.

Oh really? Prove it.

I'm sorry, mate, but that is hypocrisy.

If you say so. But I tend to think that airing my opinion about a topic, whether critical or not, is a everyones right in our society. But when you use the most notorious mass murderers name in a positive fun way and forget the heinous weight it has behind it, well in my opinion, it can be construed, at the very least, as a little insensitive. But again this is my opinion and I think that you guys are just plain wrong.

Then you are a fool. I'm a total f**king idiot.

Ok I concede, you win, you're a f**ing idiot, since you should know.

Then shut up and use it.

It's not that cool. But I may mumble it under my breath when he gets the ball and no one's looking.


Not even close. I'm a 21st Century MAN with a beard and f**king mad hair who is also hilarious. I'm not gonna wring my hands and cry rivers of bullshit tears because someone chose to use a nickname linked to a pretty f**ked up section of history.

I didn't say I was wringing my hands or crying rivers of tears over this, but now I am very upset about the fact that I'll never be as good looking as you or ever have gorgeous flowing locks as you or ever be able to grow a wonderfully strong, manly beard as yourself. Oh woe is me...:(


But then again, come to think of it, in your own words, you're a f**ing idiot. Therefore you probably look like a hairy, smelly horses arse with dysentery and a severe case of boils and arse clap. So I must say, I think I'm looking pretty awesome again. :D WHOO HOO!!!
 

Eelementary

Post Whore
Messages
57,775
No I don't. Religion is fair game considering that throughout history it has been one of the chief motivators for many of the said atrocities. Also when one thinks about it, without a smidgen of any evidence or proof to validate any of it what so ever.



Oh really? Prove it.



If you say so. But I tend to think that airing my opinion about a topic, whether critical or not, is a everyones right in our society. But when you use the most notorious mass murderers name in a positive fun way and forget the heinous weight it has behind it, well in my opinion, it can be construed, at the very least, as a little insensitive. But again this is my opinion and I think that you guys are just plain wrong.



Ok I concede, you win, you're a f**ing idiot, since you should know.



It's not that cool. But I may mumble it under my breath when he gets the ball and no one's looking.




I didn't say I was wringing my hands or crying rivers of tears over this, but now I am very upset about the fact that I'll never be as good looking as you or ever have gorgeous flowing locks as you or ever be able to grow a wonderfully strong, manly beard as yourself. Oh woe is me...:(


But then again, come to think of it, in your own words, you're a f**ing idiot. Therefore you probably look like a hairy, smelly horses arse with dysentery and a severe case of boils and arse clap. So I must say, I think I'm looking pretty awesome again. :D WHOO HOO!!!

I only meant it because you said we should be respectful and sensitive of others' beliefs and experiences (and I agree), and then you refer to Jesus Christ as an imaginary friend.
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,911
I only meant it because you said we should be respectful and sensitive of others' beliefs and experiences (and I agree), and then you refer to Jesus Christ as an imaginary friend.


I didn't say anything about beliefs. At least I don't think so, cos I believe all beliefs should be put to the test of public discussion and debate and if applicable where there is not one iota of real evidence, can be made fun of or put up for ridicule, because then it is a freakin joke. Just because billion are in total delusion doesn't make it any less so.

The earth orbiting the sun is a fact, no matter how many delusional gits didn't think so.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
79,711
The earth orbiting the sun is a fact, no matter how many delusional gits didn't think so.

Do you actually KNOW that ? Or are you just going off what you've been told ?


what-if-your-life-is-a-tv-show-and-the-truman-show-was-just-made-so-you-wouldnt-get-suspicious.jpg
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
95,753
No I don't. Religion is fair game considering that throughout history it has been one of the chief motivators for many of the said atrocities.

It was never about religion, it was about tribalism. The Soviets and Chairman Mao proved that.

Also when one thinks about it, without a smidgen of any evidence or proof to validate any of it what so ever.

Like any ideology.

Oh really? Prove it.

The year is 2014. Two thousand and fourteen years after what?

If Mao Zedong had Jesus in his life he might not have killed as many people. Fact.
 

spiderdan

Bench
Messages
3,743
historians believe they have proof that jesus did actually exist. whether or not he was the offspring of a possible paranormal entity is another question.

theram, the fact that you referred to jesus as an "imaginary friend" shows your disrespect for other people's beliefs. i agree with eelementary, you are a hypocrite.

people are allowed to believe, whether they are right or wrong, that a paranormal entity that created the universe exists. just as people are allowed to believe that in the middle of a place that doesn't exist, where nothing exists, somehow nothing collided with nothing to create a reaction that some theoretical scientists believe happened and called the big bang.

i think you need to lighten up.
 

oldmancraigy

Coach
Messages
12,070
Do you actually KNOW that ? Or are you just going off what you've been told ?

Ram's just presenting a hypocritical David Hume value system to the world around him. Nothing is true unless proven by a billion repetitions, but any first time occurance is discarded.
Therefore the first time something is done, it is discarded, the second becomes the first, and is discarded, and so on.

Ironically the position is called 'evidentialism' --> however the proponents of it seem not to have tested for themselves the vast majority of what they take for granted (if indeed testing was possible under the system they set up for themselves).

I suppose that's why studying history is more fruitful than studying philosophy...
 

Eelementary

Post Whore
Messages
57,775
I didn't say anything about beliefs. At least I don't think so, cos I believe all beliefs should be put to the test of public discussion and debate and if applicable where there is not one iota of real evidence, can be made fun of or put up for ridicule, because then it is a freakin joke. Just because billion are in total delusion doesn't make it any less so.

The earth orbiting the sun is a fact, no matter how many delusional gits didn't think so.

Ram, where do you stand on the shroud of Turin?

I ask because your line of logic sounds remarkably similar to the Catholic Church's when discussing the shroud - they claim the shroud was a genuine burial cloth, and it probably belonged to Jesus, but they then claim it is not proof of his resurrection. Can't have it both ways.

I'm reading Thomas De Wesselow's book "The Sign", and he makes some fascinating points about sceptics criticising the authenticity of the shroud because in declaring that it was genuine, they were giving in to the "silliness" if religion - despite the fact that many open sceptics privately believed the shroud to be genuine.

Point is, public opinion doesn't necessarily validate everything.
 

Casper The Ghost

First Grade
Messages
9,924
Re-presenting "intellectual property" (belief, faith & associated opinion = storytelling) is not proof of fact. It does not matter how deep and wide one delves into "intellectual property", these layers upon layers of ideas, opinions, theories, constructs, concepts, etc, coming from generations after generations of recorded his-story/her-story/history, still does not prove anything factual.

We need to bring forward the 1st party so we can all have direct sensory experience 1st party to first party in present-sense otherwise we are just relying on the image power (intellectual property) of others telling us how to think, feel and act, all of whom were 3rd parties, none of whom were there. System Science with all its carbon dating, evolution, "time" codes, etc, etc, is all fraud, are lies.

Did the sensory life-form labelled in "the system" a "yellow daffodil" tell you, first party to first party through direct sensory experience, it was "yellow" and is a "daffodil" or did another MAN educate/tell/instruct you long-ago causing you down-the-line to re-present this "intellectual property"...... "that sensory-life-form is a yellow daffodil and is part of this and that and does this and that..... blah blah blah"?????

If you fully comprehend this then you will realise that re-presenting a, b, c, 1, 2, 3, compass, square, levels, planes, distance, measurements, time, space, system-science, religions, occults, esoterics, astrology, numerology, all read and write alphabet languages, mathematics, geometry/sacred geometry, etc, etc, including words like "beginning" are lies and has you commit fraud. There is no living first party a, b, c, 1, 2, 3, beginning, etc..... coming forward as a sensory-living-life-form to back your claims that they exist, are true, are real.


[youtube]IMK7CkU1ih8[/youtube]
 
Last edited:
Top