Good post.
If FB was the position that needed strengthening (seemed to be the opinion of the coaching staff when they chased Hayne) then they should have stuck to their guns and done so.
But typical of our lot they took a different option trying to cover a raft of situations and came up well short on the original task at hand.
I am pro Dufty to the point of wanting to see him drastically improve his shortcomings to retain his spot otherwise arriva derci.
People keep talking about Tedesco well despite all his apparent brilliance now he sure as hell had some real deficiencies in his 1st couple of years and that should not be overlooked or forgotten when analysing Dufty's progression.
Dont disagree OT, but I wouldn't have wanted us to persevere with Tedesco in those first few years. I firmly believe that fullback is one of those positions where you need a player who has the skills and is not trying to develop them in first grade.
I am not against Dufty, I just dont think we should be experimenting with him in first grade. Of all the things the team needed I believe it was and still is that top flight fullback. A player who can get the roll started from kicks, solid under the kick, can read where to be in defence and is willing to put their body on the line, is able to physically break a tackle, backs up, can play before the line and through the line etc.
I know I am asking a lot and that there are very few players who fit the bill but in my opinion we need to buy the best we can for fullback.