butchmcdick
Post Whore
- Messages
- 51,928
do you work for the ABC?
sure sounds like it
No I don't actually, do you work for M Johns ? Sure sounds like it.
do you work for the ABC?
sure sounds like it
So they have been sued a few times, big deal ? Any investigative current affairs show worth it's salt would have been litigated against wouldn't it ?
Just watch they show before you pre judge it and stop carrying on like a plonker. Let me guess, you won't be able to because of some giant AFL conspiricy
and i'll be watching Monday night football, not trashy ABC
why would i watch some garbage on the ABC focusing on only one sport in an obvious witch hunt when there's footy on :?
League sex inquiry dropped due to lack of evidence
ABC - May 8, 2009, 4:18 pm
New Zealand police say there has not been enough evidence to prosecute anyone over a night of group sex involving former NRL star Matthew Johns and a 19-year-old woman in 2002.
The New Zealand woman will tell this Monday's Four Corners program that the night in Christchurch involving several Cronulla Sharks players has traumatised her.
Mr Johns insists the group sex during a pre-season tour seven years ago was consensual.
Detective Senior Sergeant Dave Long from Christchurch Police says his colleagues travelled to Australia to interview the Cronulla Sharks after the woman complained to police.
"As a result of speaking to all possible witnesses or persons that had information about the matter, it was decided that there was insufficient evidence to put the matter before a court," he said.
"Nothing's changed since then and there's no new information that's come forward since."
Speaking on the Nine Network's Footy Show on Thursday night, Mr Johns apologised to his family.
"For me personally, it has put my family through enormous anguish and embarrassment and it has once again. For that I can't say sorry enough," he said.
"But the police did investigate the situation at the time, the allegation, and there was no charges laid."
The New Zealand woman has told Four Corners the incident was degrading.
"Every time I looked up there would be more and more people in the room and there's lots of guys in the room watching - maybe two or three were on the bed that were doing stuff to me," she said.
She goes on to talk about the impact it has had on her life.
It is understood the woman has had significant emotional trauma.
Rugby league has already been dogged this season by allegations of misbehaviour, including drunkenness and allegations of sexual assault involving high-profile players.
Both sorry they were caught out.whats with the Footy Show and the Johns bros confessing ?
AFL star sued for sex assault
Article from: Herald Sun
By Carly Crawford
August 02, 2008 12:00am
A HIGH-PROFILE footy player is being sued over his role in an alleged sexual assault.
The AFL star, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is the subject of a damages claim in the Supreme Court.
The file was opened in September 2006 and remains active.
The alleged victim is suing for a six-figure sum but details of the case, including the identities of those involved, have been suppressed.
A Supreme Court Justice granted the player's request that his name remain a secret.
The Herald Sun believes the claim centres on serious sex-related allegations from an incident several years ago.
The player was accused of swapping partners during an intimate evening, despite protests from the alleged victim.
Police investigated, but no charges were laid.
Prosecutors had told police there was not enough evidence to support a criminal charge.
The player being sued has always denied any wrongdoing and said the collapse of the criminal case had cleared him.
The outcome raised fears that other sex attack victims would shy away from lodging formal complaints.
About 85 per cent of rape victims do not report attacks, according to the National Association of Services Against Sexual Violence.
Lawyers for the two parties have held talks but after nearly two years, the matter remains unresolved.
The player is represented by his lawyer, Jan Moffat from Donaldson Trumble Lawyers.
The lawyer representing the victim, sexual assault law specialist Viv Waller, declined to comment saying the matter was subject to court orders.
Sex abuse victims' advocate Caroline Worth said it was easier to win a case in the civil jurisdiction because of the lower burden of proof.
Ms Worth said that some victims found comfort in having a court acknowledge their pain.
"Civil claims at least give them another way to explore having their day in court or having someone listen to their story,'' Ms Worth said.
"Beyond reasonable doubt is a very high burden of proof for a crime where there is rarely a witness.''
Civil claims are decided on the balance of probabilities.
Ms Worth said that while civil claims were often costly, they could help sex crimes victims find closure.
"For people who can't let go and feel the need to do something, this is a very good course of action,'' she said.
Fug Johns,he's only sorry because its become public.
Who the fug wants their kids to look up to footballers any more?
Do you really think players of past eras haven't been involved in these sort of things. It's just no one gave a sh*t back then.
If News Ltd is perceived to have acted dishonourably in buying pay TV rights for sport, so has C7. An email from C7 executive Steve Wise, cited in the Federal Court, makes it clear the network bought the rights to football only to bury it, to please the AFL.
Written in November 2000 when Channel Seven still had the AFL rights, it lamented the AFL's ingratitude, saying: "There is no credit that we have secured the soccer rights and sufficated (sic) the sport, much to the chagrin of its supporters."