Big Pete
Referee
- Messages
- 29,124
Lismore. That's in Queensland!
Eligibility isn't determined by where you were born obviously.
Lismore. That's in Queensland!
But better than Joey? Don't make me laugh. JT is amazing, but i'll never be able to describe to my grandkids just how good Joey was...they'll just have to watch the footage. He had an extra 25% to his game that JT or any other half ive ever seen just doesn't have.
where do you think the 25% came from? maybe the recreational drugs he was taking during his career - great role model for your grandkids mate.....
In the last few years Matty has given off a pretty strong impression that he isn't a 'fan' of his brother. Constant heckling, down playing his chances of becoming an immortal, etc. It can be construed as jealousy, avoiding bias, brotherly love...I tend to think its a genuine dislike.
His brother is just as bad, if not worse, in the sensationalist stakes.
How many times I've heard Andrew Johns say something like "this [insert up and comer] is an absolute freak. I've never seen an athlete like him" only for said player to disappear into obscurity is laughable.
Name me one thing JT does better than Joey?
I'll give you goal kicking, but even that's almost a coin flip.
Everything else it's Joey in a landslide. Not because JT isn't great, but because Joey was a freak.
Ah of course. Wasn't that the year he went down with an ACL in rnd 1?Not get wooden spoons?
Tommy Smith said:Ah of course. Wasn't that the year he went down with an ACL in rnd 1?
Nope. Year after.
Johns suffered a broken jaw in Round 3 but famously returned in time to turn it on with a career defining performance in the second game of the Origin series in 2005. He helped snap a demoralizing losing record and helped the Knights finish strongly but not well enough to avoid the wooden spoon. Still, the Knights were probably one of the best wooden spooners of all time because of him and his winning percentage for the club was 50%.
JT has had as low as 23.53% (2008) and 17.65% (2010). The worst season Johns was ever apart of was in 94 at 38% but that was merely his first full year of first grade.
Says a lot if you want to argue that way.
With that said, I don't think Johns is some untouchable player that no one can possibly ever amount to. Like every immortal, he has his strengths and witnesses and until there's a day where a player has a perfect record it's always going to be that way. If JT for instance really comes of age in these next 4 years and wins the Cowboys at least a premiership or 4 than he'd have a case but I reckon the chances are slim to none of them winning more than one realistically.
The only argument I see for JT currently is that he's a better representative player. The numbers back him up.
I think JT has had the advantage of having better talent around him throughout his career. Joey played in some average teams that he made look half decent and at Origin level he played in decent enough teams but often out of position. Thurston at club level has arguably the best forward pack and not a bad backline either, at origin level he's played in the greatest qld team we'll ever see (not saying he isn't an integral part of that but he doesn't hurt to play alongside Smith, Slater, Lockyer, Cronk, Inglis, Scott, Petero, etc).
To me JT needs to dominate during play off time and lead the cowboys to a premiership to even be compared to Joey
I think JT has had the advantage of having better talent around him throughout his career. Joey played in some average teams that he made look half decent and at Origin level he played in decent enough teams but often out of position. Thurston at club level has arguably the best forward pack and not a bad backline either, at origin level he's played in the greatest qld team we'll ever see (not saying he isn't an integral part of that but he doesn't hurt to play alongside Smith, Slater, Lockyer, Cronk, Inglis, Scott, Petero, etc).
To me JT needs to dominate during play off time and lead the cowboys to a premiership to even be compared to Joey