A top playmaker would have given a short ball to Lucy who would have sauntered under the posts. That was the high percentage play.
Douehi went the low percentage play which included many variables - one of which occurred.
I agree with you that an eyes up play was required there. A try went begging.
I was thinking “ over-coaching” as an explanation. A strict instruction. If so, the theory was all good but the execution at the end.....
This is the controversial moment. The gap for Lucy is wide enough for the Ever Given to get stuck in.
Apart from the irregular positioning of the d, viewers might like to take note of their stances and preparedness.
There’s that second-in defender ( second from left) above following the ball, but his chances of stopping Lucy (if he had the ball) was zero and astute forumers will notice the non-existent cover. The ref was the best placed to stop him if he was a player, but Lucy could have swung left to easily avoid him.
So I agree with you and hope Madge encourages a bit of ad-hoc when opportunity knocks.
An additional but largely unnoticed advantage for the Lucy option was his proximity to the posts for an easier conversion. Not critical on the day, but in theory, very important. Thus a fulsome 6 points was on offer.
If we want to get to the finals, we need this eyes up mindset as much as cunning set plays.
I watched Madge again at the press conference, he was big-picturing as per usual, very pleased as to the resilience and “ growth of the team” as he puts it.
I think there has been growth, but it is not as evenly spread out or as apparent in games as we would have hoped for. So jury’s still out.
Des Hasler will be available at the end of the year even as an assistant, as his contract has kpis in it, which his side is not meeting.
The disconnect for him is frightening and I wish him the best. He’s a very good coach.