I'm very sorry, The Nick. I misconstrued your message as support for Mary's appointment.
There are plenty that are fine with Mary's appointment
I'm very sorry, The Nick. I misconstrued your message as support for Mary's appointment.
You're a dead set idiot. You wouldn't know incompetence if it smacked you in the face.
Objective View
Harsh.
But fair.
They gave him 3 years in an attempt to create some certainty for him and the players.
If we get the spoon next year, he may well be shown the door. And his payout would be considerably less than a sheens or Henry.
That's the only rationale I can see regarding his 3 year contract.
that rationale sounds about right, but if he fails miserably like price then surely doust has to go which by the way won't happen too. I'm starting to like what i see with mc gregor he can certainly get the boys up to play and can get them to win the games they should win. The losses against the good teams like manly and roosters was not massive losses that can't be turned around.
We love the leaderThere are plenty that are fine with Mary's appointment
It is interesting to note that since we are winning & playing good football the doom makers have gone quiet. Hope the boys can keep up the momentum & finish the season on a bright note even if they may happen to miss the playoffs.
Mary is doing a good job so let's get behind him & support his efforts. It's not too hard if you try.
So you are saying that my comments are incorrect. If we play well people say its a bad opposition yet when we loose it's not how well the opposition played but how bad we were.Didn't you say the same thing at the start of the season about Price ?
Good luck living in your deluded world ,if you're happy with the way things are at this club at the moment,try looking at things the way they actually are not what you wish them to be .
This team has been unable to match it with any team that gives it to them in defense ,hence the losses against all of the higher teams on the table, then we play a few of the lesser quality teams in the comp and win and some are carrying on like we are superstars because they can beat those sides.
The game on the weekend -case in point- Titans were terrible but a lot choose to gloss over that MINOR detail.
LOL at making the finals ,what do you think we would do if on the almost impossible chance we scraped in there(as opposed to they MAY happen to miss the finals), we would be playing side 1 or 2 and the issue i outlined above comes into play and the fact is Mcgregor hasn't been able to get enough out of the side to defeat these sides .
there is some doom making for you ...... just so you know we are still alive
Just on finals the way these guys played for half of the year ,they don't deserve to play finals.
"I haven't looked deep into the roster and the salary cap but that will be happening over the next month. But what I also need to do is have an in-depth look at our football department, right through from the juniors to the senior structure and once I do that I'll know what's next.
That statement alone from Mary surprises me. How long has he been at the Dragons and now admits he hasn't had a deep look at the roster or football department but will do so over the next month...the horse will have bolted by then. When he was appointed coach for 3 years didn't Doust say it was his clear vision and plans for the club that impressed the Board and persuaded them to appoint him as coach.
So you are saying that my comments are incorrect. If we play well people say its a bad opposition yet when we loose it's not how well the opposition played but how bad we were.
Mate get a life. You can't have it both ways.
In your initial post you said we are playing good footy, we are playing an improved version of what we played earlier in the season, but a long way away from being any sort of a threat to top sides, I wouldn't call it good.
Your comments above are correct, as i said we are only capable of beating sides who play poorly, and quite obviously when we lose against the top sides its commonsense that the opposition played better than us but also and that we played poorly otherwise we would win.
As i said in the other post your backing of PRICE hardly stands you as a good judge.
"I haven't looked deep into the roster and the salary cap but that will be happening over the next month. But what I also need to do is have an in-depth look at our football department, right through from the juniors to the senior structure and once I do that I'll know what's next.
That statement alone from Mary surprises me. How long has he been at the Dragons and now admits he hasn't had a deep look at the roster or football department but will do so over the next month...the horse will have bolted by then. When he was appointed coach for 3 years didn't Doust say it was his clear vision and plans for the club that impressed the Board and persuaded them to appoint him as coach.
Lol. Who said I backed Price. All I kept saying early on that he should be given a chance without the doom makers coming on board . All right I was wrong but all you seem to do it continually have a bloody whinge even if we do play well.
Keep whinging son, it suits you as you don't know any other way.
No further comments. By me as I am about to board the plane on a return flight to Dragons territory.
Ah the old chestnut I'm a whinger because my view of the way things are at STGI doesn't match yours.
When i see some inroads into getting this team truly competitive again after watching 3 years of crap , i will be positive , but from what i see at the moment, that's still a long way to go, backed up by our spot on the ladder.
Ah the old chestnut I'm a whinger because my view of the way things are at STGI doesn't match yours.
When i see some inroads into getting this team truly competitive again after watching 3 years of crap , i will be positive , but from what i see at the moment, that's still a long way to go, backed up by our spot on the ladder.