Melbourne "No Try"

[yobbo84]

It never got to the grass but the on field ref needs the option of "I have no f**king idea". The guessing of try or no try is silly when they have no view at all

Definitely agree with this.

The awarding/removal of try farce aside, just send it up as a try, a no try, or "unsighted".

 

[Iamback]

There's absolutely no guarantee we beat you even playing differently. I just would've liked to see us adapt, somewhat.

Your issue is the same as the Broncos

Lack of plodders, plenty of flair but no one to do the ugly stuff

 

[age.s]

Definitely agree with this.

The awarding/removal of try farce aside, just send it up as a try, a no try, or "unsighted".

What would be the point? What do they do if there are no good camera angles? Send it down for the ref to make a call? If so, that's functionally what we have now.

 

[age.s]

Your issue is the same as the Broncos

Lack of plodders, plenty of flair but no one to do the ugly stuff

We don't have that many plodders, we have several Nigel Plums though.

 

[Iamback]

We don't have that many plodders, we have several Nigel Plums though.

You don't get out of the car park at the academy if you won't do the ugly stuff

 

[Tiger5150]

You don't get out of the car park at the academy if you won't do the ugly stuff

Penrith carparks are where the ugliest stuff happens as a rule.

 

[ACTPanthers]

Penrith carparks are where the ugliest stuff happens as a rule.

Are we meeting there again sweetheart? Or your place this time?

 

[blue bags]

It was called No Try so that means it's a No Try. So, you need to move on and try and score again.

Did part of the ball touch the grass. I believe so. However, it was called no try on field and hard to overturn with that evidence.

Happens all the time. Stiff shit. Cleary smart for jumping in front of camera.

Penrith too good again.

Needs to be an investigation into this
The Ball was on the ground
C'mon
Bigger TVs
Bigger one's
Surely we have better one's
Is this the best we have
C'mon