What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Melbourne "No Try"

age.s

First Grade
Messages
7,787
Definitely agree with this.

The awarding/removal of try farce aside, just send it up as a try, a no try, or "unsighted".
What would be the point? What do they do if there are no good camera angles? Send it down for the ref to make a call? If so, that's functionally what we have now.
 

blue bags

First Grade
Messages
9,347
It was called No Try so that means it's a No Try. So, you need to move on and try and score again.

Did part of the ball touch the grass. I believe so. However, it was called no try on field and hard to overturn with that evidence.

Happens all the time. Stiff shit. Cleary smart for jumping in front of camera.

Penrith too good again.
Needs to be an investigation into this
The Ball was on the ground
C'mon
Bigger TVs
Bigger one's
Surely we have better one's
Is this the best we have
C'mon 😅
 

Frankus

Juniors
Messages
2,340
As a panthers fan - would be fine if sent up a try and awarded. Personally I don’t know if it was. Howarth didn’t look overly confident when he first got up, usually a telling sign.

I’m surprised (mind you haven’t read all the comments) no one is questioning whether Turuva grounded the ball for his try. At the time I was surprised it wasn’t scrutinised more.

Them’s the breaks I guess.
 

Munky

Coach
Messages
12,073
The Bunker conclusively ruled a no-try. (correctly)

There was no inconclusive about it.

If the commentators eyes weren't painted on, this wouldn't even be being dicussed.

If they showed the synced angles it would be talked about as one of the great defensive plays.

It was a pretty easy flop over the line for Howarth but he stuffed an easy try.
 

Latest posts

Top