crap... you avoid my rants... because you have no f**king answer to the points I make.. because your stance is ridiculous... and you know it...Sorry, I didn't read most of your rant.
I asked, are you drunk?
Sorry, I didn't read most of your rant.
I asked, are you drunk?
:lol:oh and I'm not drunk yet...
No you didn't. You accidentally quoted my reply to Softy. You're a mess.20knights10 said:I most certainly answered you question about whether I want to rephrase my claim... are you really this stupid? serious question.....
:lol: More, please....crap... you avoid my rants... because you have no f**king answer to the points I make.. because your stance is ridiculous... and you know it...
and your first post continues the trend... how f**king predictable...crap... you avoid my rants... because you have no f**king answer to the points I make.. because your stance is ridiculous... and you know it...
Yes I did... I accidentally included your quote to SoftSydney in my responsive post to you. I did this whilst not quite drunk. I'm still not quite drunk, but I'm working on it. This does not change my previous points, nor yours. Yours are pretty f**king ridiculous, even for a centurian monk.... get on with it... are you really as stupid as you're making out you are in this thread?:lol:
Sure.
Any tips on what your next name change will be?
No you didn't. You accidentally quoted my reply to Softy. You're a mess.
Your own semantics are getting the better of you.
ouch... gosh you're good....:lol: More, please....
Softy, did you really think you had a solid case here? You're speculating on a totaly irrelevant random event that might happen in the future.Imbecile making stuff up said:I am speculating that the possibility exists that you could merge again in the future as you cant seem to stand alone as a club..I didnt say it was fact.
Did you just answer yourself?and your first post continues the trend... how f**king predictable...
Well, good for you.Yes I did... I accidentally included your quote to SoftSydney in my responsive post to you. I did this whilst not quite drunk. I'm still not quite drunk, but I'm working on it.
That's a compelling argument you've got now. Crownies or Carlton Draught long necks?This does not change my previous points, nor yours. Yours are pretty f**king ridiculous, even for a centurian monk.... get on with it... are you really as stupid as you're making out you are in this thread?
Softy, did you really think you had a solid case here? You're speculating on a totaly irrelevant random event that might happen in the future.
Where's your source?
Was it the vibe?
Or did someone lead you up the garden path?
The knight has been barbecuing you the last few days, I am here for you if you need a shoulder x
Says you........................., and the last time I checked you were not the judge, jury, executioner or even the f**king spit bucket boy in here.
Frankly, I don't give a sh*t about most of this, the dickheads I argued with in here are pretty much a mirror of some others in here, and with regard to that I am going to side with Willow as I had the same thing happen to me after I hit them with a few home truths:
When a question is asked of you in relation to that topic it would do some of you well to answer it based on the relevant materials, particularly if they have been supplied to you.
Dancing around the question simply gives off an air of arrogance and stupidity.
When you don't make an honest attempt to refute some of the claims in a decent manner or constructively debate some materials, you come off looking like a rank arsehole who couldn't deal with the material in the first place.
If you want to look like a dickhead with no credibility just put "tldr" or attack the person posting it instead of addressing the question itself.
You should know that many a game has been lost by people playing the man and not the ball.
Well said golden greek... willow I mean BBQ you should read this post :lol:
I was referring to the chorus of arseholes who have danced around some questions and instead chose to level baseless personal insults, such as the mathematical genius and the f**king undergraduate accountant who were populating this thread.
YOU seem to be taking a leaf from their book SoftSydney.
Don't.
Have a nice f**king day.
golden greek I genuinely fully agree with you.
No you didn't. You trolled out a claim that the Dragons and Raiders were merging. It backfired on you.I said I was speculating based on the history of STG
No you didn't. You trolled out a claim that the Dragons and Raiders were merging. It backfired on you.
I knew it was old speculation from October and about some proposed NSWRL feeder arrangements, and that you had just made a goose of yourself.
You were trying to create a piece of misinformation.
And Softy, please stop sooking to me about about other member's posts.
I am speculating that the possibility exists that you could merge again in the future as you cant seem to stand alone as a club..I didnt say it was fact.
I think its time you withdrew the 16 notion, do the right thing BBQ and admit its just a fantasy, admit your wrong and admit the lie.
You seem really stressed out mate!
lol... you are way too desperate mate... she "trolled" out a piece that showed that the NSWRL were suggesting the StGI and Canberra Raiders NSW Cup teams merge... and provided a link... speculating from that point on is not the same as creating a piece of misinformation... you really are f**king desperate.... really really really desperate.... you're losing it mate.... you should take 2 asprin and go to bed, and if pain persists see your family doctor....No you didn't. You trolled out a claim that the Dragons and Raiders were merging. It backfired on you.
I knew it was old speculation from October and about some proposed NSWRL feeder arrangements, and that you had just made a goose of yourself.
You were trying to create a piece of misinformation.
And Softy, please stop sooking to me about about other member's posts.