The beaver you could argue either way
My understanding is that officially the NRL sees Menzies as playing with two clubs. But ask most Manly supporters and they see him as a one club player. I have no problem with that. There was a thread about it in the Dragons forum and every Saints supporter who replied thought he was a one club (NRL) player.
http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showthread.php?t=371232
I suspect Dutchy (who started the thread) was trying to be mischievious but was pleasantly surprised to see the support for Menzies in a Dragons forum.
Point is, the Menzies example shows that there are contradictions that people can live with.
SoftSydney said:
as for the NRL it has evolved with the clubs and fans hence they have always been one and the same abit like the holly trinity.
Well the NRL is a joint venture, formed in 1998. They make up the rules to suit themselves. Again, I have no problem with a continuation of the history of the NSWRL. It's just another contradiction that we are happy to accept.
SoftSydney said:
I get where your coming from just dont agree.
I can live with that too. lol.
SoftSydney said:
I also feel for the Illawarra fans when you guiys say 16, how can they identify with it.
I haven't heard any complaints. In fact, some of the Saints fans arguing in favour of 16 are from Illawarra side of the JV. I don't all of supporters of course. But I once told by an Illawarra supporter that they thought they had adopted the wonderful history of St George when the JV was formed, and he was surprised and disappointed to learn that the NRL had stuffed it up in the official records.
SoftSydney said:
It doesnt look like we will solve the middle east problem anytime soon
lol. No, I guess not.