Tiger Shark
Bench
- Messages
- 3,150
No idea. Why did this come up in the middle of this thread?
Well you compared it to Facebook, going on rants and changing topic is what happens
No idea. Why did this come up in the middle of this thread?
You’d have starved under bomber then.Because those in the know were selling it as a package.
Dominos etc.
If we don’t get the whole package it’s a very different proposition. A way worse proposition if CF isn’t the next super coach.
we got the garlic bread but no pizza and drink. Garlic bread is ok but I’m pretty hungry
Look Dino - if it aint broke dont fix it.
But we were broke.
Since the GF win one would hope a dynasty would begin.
An era where we threatened to add another every season, however we lost the mojo we had created.
The aura where we the team nobody wanted to play in the big ones.
We became the side who couldnt even compete with the top half of the competition.
So yep - we needed fixing.
Do you start with the coach?..thats the point obviously - and yep Im saying l agree with Morris going.
He needs more experience.
Silly me.Well you compared it to Facebook, going on rants and changing topic is what happens
It’s not rich at all if you think about what you actually suggested. Who takes that job when the KPI is to win the comp. KPIs are smaller parts that form the whole picture. So a top 4 finish while maintaining cap compliance and junior development might form the complete set. Not to win the comp. If you aren’t going to discuss it properly then just jump back on Twitter and tell everyone the board should be sacked.
Yaaawn.So the answer to having an inexperienced coach is a rookie coach.
No the answer to having an inexperienced coach is to have an experienced coach.So the answer to having an inexperienced coach is a rookie coach.
Yes.Will it be a failure if we miss the finals next year?
I’m sure he’s very good at what he does. But he’s unproven as a head coach.Yaaawn.
Rookie?
Read up about fitz's role and input into the elite football operation that is the roosters....and his role with the blues SOO program.
The fact you even compare bomber and fitz..
The fact you think its apple for apples..
Oh you know the rest
No the answer to having an inexperienced coach is to have an experienced coach.
Yes.
You don’t have to be head coach to have coaching experience. Fitz has been in Robinson’s top pocket for years. Fitz is more qualified to be HC than John Morris Is.Bellamy?
We had one when I said top 4 but you wanted it to be win the GF, a childish suggestion.ok good. Now we have a KPI
You don’t have to be head coach to have coaching experience. Fitz has been in Robinson’s top pocket for years. Fitz is more qualified to be HC than John Morris Is.
Yep...unproven. True.I’m sure he’s very good at what he does. But he’s unproven as a head coach.
I wish him the best, but it’s new for him.
We had one when I said top 4 but you wanted it to be win the GF, a childish suggestion.
Agree totally. Again he wasn’t extended past his current contract ad there was a better option.I think it's no secret Bomber was probably given the job a bit early, but he was in our system, was cheap and better option than Dymock.
No doubt this experience has been good for him, he'll go back to being an AC, hopefully where he can learn more and have another crack at a HC role sometime in the future.
Well ciraldo has said no
If we don't get AR and SJ moves on then that is a real worrying sign
All likely as well