All those videos, articles and opinion pieces too much for you to handle?
:lol: I posted more evidence and "facts" than you ever provided in your argument.
You seemed to ignore almost every single point I made, so I assume I was correct regarding the majority of my argument.
And yes, you are a hypocrite because you used one video to show how "limited" Bale is after going on arrogantly about one having to provide facts to support ones argument, despite you yourself using very little.
It's just a pathetic excuse to back out of an argument you know you are out of your depth in.
Oh I see, because I called you a pathetic hypocrite and implied you were stupid, you backed out, regardless of the progress of the argument. Pointing out the hypocrisy of someone is less an insult and more a characterization or implication. But I guess the pathetic part got to you, you know, because basing your argument on one almost irrelevant video and turning around to say that I had to supply a range of facts really was anything more than what I implied?
Implying you had half a brain was uncalled for.
But then, you didn't match the majority of points I made with anything but an arrogant indifference, insisting upon a point multiple times without bothering to back it up.
Like how I discussed in detail how Bale was superior to Nani in several areas, how Bale had evolved his play this season, and how Bale has become far more diverse.
But no, all you replied with was that Nani was dangerous on both feet, can apparently play more roles and is a better finisher. Whilst the last point is certainly true, the other two points you made don't include that Bale has a better left foot in terms of crossing and in general play, that Bale can actually cover every position Nani can except as a striker, though Bale can be played at left fullback.
But no. Nothing at all other than one video that proves to you Bale only has a good left foot and has pace.
Let's get some opinion pieces and reviews going.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/227484
They talk about his capability to effectively play on the left, right and in the centre.
http://m.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/story/2012/01/02/wonderous-welsh-wingers/
A well written article that moots any point about a player having to have been in a successful team or have won trophies to be considered a fantastic or great player. This is also relevant for the idiots arguing about the difference in UCL titles for Nani and Robben.
I would post a link to an EPL/ManU forum but it isn't allowed I believe.
It do happens that the majority of posters in the topic I wished to link to we're raving about Bale. In fact, a grouping of them believe that under SAF he could very well develop into the next Cristiano Ronaldo. I found that to be a massive stretch, but the key point that most understand but you ignore is Bale's age - he is only 22. Most pundits believe he has a lot of growth in him, which makes sense. He's certainly got the physical presence of Ronaldo, but the skill-set is pbviously another issue. Interesting to note that those that made the comparisons to Ronaldo expressed how Ronaldo started as an out-and-out winger at United but with age began to develop into more roles and become the player he is now.
Bale isn't at that level yet but I'd argue he is presently a better player than Nani and in a few seasons could well be considered the best left midfielder in the world. Again though, it's a stretch.
