perverse
Referee
- Messages
- 26,505
guarenteeing that we'll make $2,000,000 less than we currently do is not securing the financial future of the club.
a deal that guarenteed we'd earn $3million more a year did a $5million backflip practically over night and you haven't caught up yet. that is - it went from +$3mill a year to -$2mill.
i've said before i don't care if Tinkler puts his own money in, and i don't. what does matter is that the clubs income must be guarenteed to increase significantly, on paper. the incentive needs to be there. if Tinkler wants to include ticketing and corporate hospitality in the guarentee, then put the figure at $15mill a year. there needs to be incentive to grow the club on paper, plain and simple.
the deal was a furphy, B-dos. accept that and move on. you're making yourself look really f**king stupid, and the whole LU community is watching.
a deal that guarenteed we'd earn $3million more a year did a $5million backflip practically over night and you haven't caught up yet. that is - it went from +$3mill a year to -$2mill.
i've said before i don't care if Tinkler puts his own money in, and i don't. what does matter is that the clubs income must be guarenteed to increase significantly, on paper. the incentive needs to be there. if Tinkler wants to include ticketing and corporate hospitality in the guarentee, then put the figure at $15mill a year. there needs to be incentive to grow the club on paper, plain and simple.
the deal was a furphy, B-dos. accept that and move on. you're making yourself look really f**king stupid, and the whole LU community is watching.