Same as North Queensland - ie. Southern Hemisphere summer.When is Fiji cyclone season ?
National RG
National U20s
Southern League / Northern League / Eastern League
All NRL and Tier 2 clubs have a U18 and U16 junior team
Everything else operates in A grade mode
Thats my blueprint
Simple
If a NRL club doesnt want to operate like this then they can revert to Tier 2 leagues
What does the commissioners do and if that can be answered is there one that oversees expansion and/or development for players outside of the East Coast?
National RG
National U20s
Southern League / Northern League / Eastern League
All NRL and Tier 2 clubs have a U18 and U16 junior team
Everything else operates in A grade mode
Thats my blueprint
Simple
If a NRL club doesnt want to operate like this then they can revert to Tier 2 leagues
This would dilute the lower tiers too much. Where does a 19yo player who is trying to establish themselves as a first grade NRL player go? Reserve grade, U20s or Platinum League? There is no clear comp which is just below the NRL.
This would dilute the lower tiers too much. Where does a 19yo player who is trying to establish themselves as a first grade NRL player go? Reserve grade, U20s or Platinum League? There is no clear comp which is just below the NRL.
What does the commissioners do and if that can be answered is there one that oversees expansion and/or development for players outside of the East Coast?
This would dilute the lower tiers too much. Where does a 19yo player who is trying to establish themselves as a first grade NRL player go? Reserve grade, U20s or Platinum League? There is no clear comp which is just below the NRL.
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...ml?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook
Tl;dr - the NRL plans to revamp the NSW Cup into a regional league with no specific clubs represented.
So many things wrong with this. Gus Gould is on the warpath on twitter about it and I'd expect articles to hit soon.
1) What's the point? It's not even a national reserve grade - it's just a rejigged NSW cup. Further reach could be achieved by the NSW Cup just by accepting new team entries. Without....
2) Damaging development pathways. Clubs will lose control over their youth and backup players. Players from different clubs will be playing together in reserve grade for no benefit. Clubs will lose incentive to invest in youth, providing scholarships and opportunities.
3) Seriously though what's the point?
4) Increasing NRL squads by 5 (good) but increasing the cap by $150k (geniused). This is in effect decreasing the cap by 250k, since the minimum wage is 80k.
5) No consultation with the clubs who currently handle all development work (the NRL does *nothing*) is ridiculously unprofessional.
6) Another step towards clubs having no local identity - not long before they exist purely as professional franchises with no connection to their birthplace except in name. I know this works in US Pro Sports but it isn't the way it's done here and it isn't the only correct way to run a sport.
They are clearly trying to move towards a NRL run development pathway with NSW as the first trial, I'd guess culminating in a draft. Not long until the QLD Cup is on the chopping block and they won't get a say in it either, but presumably they'll put up a fight.
The NRL has zero experience in developing players and are taking this away from clubs who've been doing it for 40 60 or 100 years.
They might have their finances in order under the ARLC for the first time ever but their decision making process around the game itself is catastrophic. The ARLC, Todd Greenberg, Shane Richardson, are a trainwreck.
http://www.theroar.com.au/2016/02/06/new-nrl-ceo-another-month-away-2/
Found this AAP article at the roar league section. It mentions specifically that the "platinum league" sits above the NSW and QLD cups. I had thought that with the initial nrl releases on this that it was the re-organization of the existing state leagues and not a new tier of conpetition. I am not neccessarily for or against either method as they both have good and bad points but some clarity on what they are doing would be nice since it affects fans and players.
I wish they would just release the strategic document to the public in its entirety to remove all of this hearsay, that would be good orporate governance and transparency which is likely too much to ask these days.
it will be a disaster. they should just let the nsw nrl clubs have their own nsw cup sides, and if places like dubbo, coffs harbour, fiji, etc, want to have a team in the nsw cup too then let them
Imo a professional centrally funded second division could work, that is having teams with no affiliation to nrl clubs. The stronger brisbane clubs could probably transition to that as stand alone entities and then teams like the central coast bears, NZ franchises, west coast could get off the ground in the professional sense with a home in a second tier.
I think the best the best solution for the nrl clubs is too keep the NYC, increase the age to U21 and allow a certain number of overage players to be fielded on matchday. So it acts as a limited reserve grade and coaches have max control over development of contracted players all under nrl club branding. contracted players not in their short term plans could be loaned out to the lower tiers for development for set periods exactly like the FIFA player loan market. But i would split the NYC into two geographic baaed groups of 8 to limit the travel burden and drop the schedule to 21 games (3x7 H&A) with the league winners meeting on grand final day. Below NYC i would have U18 and U16 as they are now but with increased bush participation in NSW, really the pathway needs tidied up so we dont have the likes of the central coast weakened in both the NSWRL and CRL championships as players can only elect 1 to play in.
Richo and others seem obsessed with the US soorts models, the comment by richo about replicating the baseball minor league relationship with the MLB stands out as stupid to me. Really given rugby league players develop though club pathways and not schools/college means their case studies should have been looking at european football structures which is basically what i have mentioned above.
http://www.theroar.com.au/2016/02/06/new-nrl-ceo-another-month-away-2/
Found this AAP article at the roar league section. It mentions specifically that the "platinum league" sits above the NSW and QLD cups. I had thought that with the initial nrl releases on this that it was the re-organization of the existing state leagues and not a new tier of conpetition. I am not neccessarily for or against either method as they both have good and bad points but some clarity on what they are doing would be nice since it affects fans and players.
I wish they would just release the strategic document to the public in its entirety to remove all of this hearsay, that would be good orporate governance and transparency which is likely too much to ask these days.
Richo and others seem obsessed with the US soorts models, the comment by richo about replicating the baseball minor league relationship with the MLB stands out as stupid to me. Really given rugby league players develop though club pathways and not schools/college means their case studies should have been looking at european football structures which is basically what i have mentioned above.
A changed but similar system in the NRL would look like u18s, u20s, Reserves, NRL. Not this platinum league idea.