Thanks very much for sharing, OT. I don't remember seeing any of that footage before. I tend to think though that it shows a very different game in a very different era. The kicking duel for example, the chip shown in that brilliant backline movement. It gives the impression of more movement of the ball when tackles were not restricted. The days when centres could combine rather than being distant cousins.
Amazing crowds, especially in the rain. But I don't think the crowds can be used as a measure of the quality of the footy. Without the incredible TV exposure of the modern era, people wanting to watch the footy had no choice but to go to the ground. The same for all major sports. I have already told the story of joining 10,000 others in squeezing into Hurstville Oval in 1960 to watch the Rugby match between South Harbour and Fiji. A very different world!
Indeed you make good sense as always
My posts are somewhat push back against the theory that modern coaches are superior to and have it tougher than those of past eras.
The crowds to me are a true measure of the quality of the product on offer and no doubt just like TV ratings are used as a measure the gate takings pre TV saturation indicated tge cried was getting its monies worth.
So big crowds = big takings = good product = good contest = crowd satisfaction = good skills = good coaching.
I make that point on the basis that people in here for years have been saying boycott the games for the very reason they are not getting their $ worth so therefore IMO the opposite applies and needs to be pointed out.
Indeed they were very different times and it was a very different game but it was equally as important to them as it is to those in todays era.
I suppose I do bristle up when I think that those of yesteryear are being “undersold” or even “maligned” and I just hope that some of the younger ones go back and do some research on just how good players and coaches actually were in a time when the game meant as much to them as it does those in todays world.