Is getting Cronk better than keeping Maloney ? I don't see any distinct advantage
Yep. Backwards move in many ways. Max 1 year left in him, huge money and most likely not suited to partner with Chad.Completely agree : in 2018 Maloney >>> Cronk !
Cronk will not come for less than $1M - if at all - and would only be here for 2018 anyway.
Flanno came out publicly with his formula of the top x players taking 40% of the cap - how would that be looking better with Cronk replacing Maloney?
I just don't get Flanno's public slapdowns of Maloney - it will cost us more to get a replacement, with lesser skills & leadership than Jimmy. Just upgrade Jimmy to $900k, problem solved. Stop faffing about Flanno, swallow your pride & get it done.
This. Keep the band together. f**k Gronk.No neither do I... considering Maloney is a gun goal kicker as well as a good game manager.
It did come from slothfield though
Is getting Cronk better than keeping Maloney ? I don't see any distinct advantage
Be a downgrade for us to get Cronk especially as we have Maloney under contract!
Absolutely
Look at the age difference!
Scott had disagreements with Flanno too didn't he? That is probably why Gal hates him.Direct from Flanno via my mate who is mates with him.
ha...cronk would be keeping Kent up to date daily with his preferences...lolThat's alright, Cronullas biggest fan Paul Kent says Cronulla is 9th out of the 9 Sydney clubs on Cronks preferred club list