And there it is, the deflection, a poor one mind you but at least no backpedaling this time.
That point is entirely irrelevant however, since you claimed it would only take "top talent", which would mean they would be "developed" in the Australian Rugby system, not the NRL. So your argument is still wrong.
Next backpedal or deflection?
It's not a backpedal or deflection, you're just too stupid and arrogant to understand that there're social and economic factors that incentivise Kiwi's to move to Australia in pursuit of better opportunities that simply don't exist on anywhere near the same scale in the reverse, and that that has an impact on the talent pools of each nation.
As soon as a Kiwi athlete moves to Australia he's competing in Australian talent pool for a professional contract, not in NZ's, and to pretend that isn't the case is just really silly frankly.
You're trying to reduce something complex down to a single factor analysis, and that's always really stupid.
BTW, currently the Australian Rugby system feeds into the NRL and AFL as much as anything else. Sports leagues will happily poach prospects at any point in the system, and for RU that means that they lose pretty much all of their top prospects to codes that can afford to offer significantly more lucrative deals.
Being largely lumped with all the NRL and AFL's rejects is actually one of their biggest problems, and it's been getting worse with each passing generation.