What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Zealand 2 will deal a massive blow to NZ rugby

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,330

mongoose

Coach
Messages
11,817
Is that a list of the least desirable places in Australia
well that's just an opinion but who cares anyway? Hawaii is a lovely destination but has no sports teams of note. Dallas is one of the more dull cities in the US and has one of the biggest sports teams in the world.
 
Messages
14,822
It’s simply not communism or even close.

Firstly, there is isn’t a common ownership aspect here.

The ARLC controls the game. The players are paid with money that's provided to the clubs by the ARLC. Players who hold different political views to the ARLC are punished. The Manly "pride" saga is a case in point.

Secondly, any player is able to go wherever he/she (in the NRLW sense) wishes to go. The way you are seemingly looking at this you are suggesting that players are somehow owned by the NRL or a central body and told where to go or play. If a player wishes to play for Melbourne or PNG or wherever, they are free to do so.

Israel Folau?

He wasn't free to play for whoever he wanted. Clubs weren't allowed to sign him. He didn't support the latest fad.

Todd Carney?

Players stood down because they were accused of doing something but haven't had their day in court?

Most players have limited options. Only one club might be interested in a player.

Thirdly, the closest thing that PR is arguing for is a subsidy. A subsidy again isn’t communism. You can argue whether it is fair or not (and on occasions it isn’t fair) but again it isn’t communism.

There's nothing fair about taking from the providers and giving it to the bludgers. Storm have been budging off SEQ for decades.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,869
There's nothing fair about taking from the providers and giving it to the bludgers. Storm have been budging off SEQ for decades.
That's literally how western societies are set up in the taxation and welfare systems lol
Sharing the wealth and trying to make everyone as successful as they can be is no bad thing.

I thought it was very generous of Melbourne to give redcliffe a leg up when no decent players wanted to go there lol
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,330
no we dont, in a country with 6 states we arent in 3 of them. That doesnt smack of national does it?
I know you haven’t lived in Australia all your life but Australia is more than just the capital cities

I mean not having a team In the nations capital when your biggest rival does ….. now that smacks of not being national

plus you can’t claim to be National when your so called National comp loses to another by 40 million viewers
 

Latest posts

Top