flippikat
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,222
Quite rightly too - they were just hitting great form when they were axed.Even if the Rebels are cut/ forced to merge the Jaguars are set to re enter to replace them
Quite rightly too - they were just hitting great form when they were axed.Even if the Rebels are cut/ forced to merge the Jaguars are set to re enter to replace them
India has more than 25x the player pool of NZ in Cricket yet NZ has made more WC finals across the 3 formats than India in the last decade.Fair enough but you do realise that we are talking about 15 × ? That of a side that has won WC ?
Yep that’s going to be worth a lot for the Australian tv deal lmaoEven if the Rebels are cut/ forced to merge the Jaguars are set to re enter to replace them
All blacks have been playing the dregs of Australian rugby talent in the wallabies and celebrating it as an achievementALL Rugby league came from RU..
The demise of Rugby is Australia directly correlates with with the rise of the NRL.
There's 2 different types of Rugby:
Rugby league and Rugby union
They are and always have been in direct competition.
Here's an interesting take to consider:
If Australia never switched over from Union, the playing numbers and fans in Union would be 15 × the size.... Australia would dominate the world in Rugby Union and there would have never been this reasonably even international scene.
International Union wouldn't be the draw card it is today. The All blacks would be used to being flogged by 50 by Australia .
Its a ridiculous statement isnt it.India has more than 25x the player pool of NZ in Cricket yet NZ has made more WC finals across the 3 formats than India in the last decade.
No doubt Aus would be more of a power if they only had 1 Rugby code but definitely not beating All Blacks by 50 level
Im interested to know how you think it will play out when there is no one else in NZ offering an alternative tv offer?100%
NRL to Sky " our numbers are booming and we're adding a game "
RU to Sky " our numbers are dwindling and we're cutting a game "
Ge, I wonder how this plays out lol
Cmon Perth red you said nobody was going to bid for nz2Im interested to know how you think it will play out when there is no one else in NZ offering an alternative tv offer?
You’re reimagining the argument again, when have I ever said Sky will cut their offer? I’ve said they don’t have limitless cash to throw around and and NZ2 doesnt necessarily mean they’ll be in a financial position to double their offer for example. Being the only credible bidder and under financial stress will make for interesting times next negotiationsYep that’s going to be worth a lot for the Australian tv deal lmao
now tell us again why sky nz will be cutting the amount they offer the sport whose ratings are up massively
You’ve thrown 74% numerous times, not doubting it just curious where you’re sourcing that from, Sky ratings are notoriously hard to come byCmon Perth red you said nobody was going to bid for nz2
and png were no chance
you are about as accurate as the other pretend league fans on this thread
warriors ratings are up 74 percent
you lie. I said that at the time there was no bids or backers. As it stands we still havent seen any money men come forward.Cmon Perth red you said nobody was going to bid for nz2
and png were no chance
you are about as accurate as the other pretend league fans on this thread
warriors ratings are up 74 percent
Bias? Jesus fecking Christ! You’ve got that covered dick brain!I understand your bias opinion on this, but you didnt really answer my point of why tv audiences cant be relied on. I didnt include the AFL grant when I mentioned they have by far the largest FC revenue. For me attendnace will always be the #1 measure of a clubs active fanbase. Its the most relaible one we have imo.
Anyway for want of being accused of talking afl I'll leave this debate for elsewhere lol.
There are now two bids when you said none would materialiseyou lie. I said that at the time there was no bids or backers. As it stands we still havent seen any money men come forward.
you lie. I never said they wouldnt, I said at the time we were disucssing it they hadnt. At the moment we have two interested bidders.There are now two bids when you said none would materialise
you also said a png team was zero chance of happening and the nrl games at Vegas wouldn’t happen
at least you are consistent
You said png will never get a teamyou lie. I never said they wouldnt, I said at the time we were disucssing it they hadnt. At the moment we have two interested bidders.
1. Local league guys who think they can fund it with blockchain
2. Experienced pros, some with less than shiny RL backgrounds, who think they can fund it with fan ownership.
Neither AT THIS TIME, look very credible,
They havent yetYou said png will never get a team
You said Vegas wouldn’t happen
you said nz2 was no chance
your credibility is as bad as the union trolls on this thread
is zilch
Club 19 to be announced this year too with pngThey havent yet
I said Id be surprised if it did and if led to anything
No I didnt
You lie.
Why not redress the 2 NZ bids glaringly obvious issues if you believe one of them will be club 18? They have been around for a couple of months, only just spoken to NRL, have no funding that we know of, yet you think they are a good chance to be announced in 6 months as club 18? Cuckoo cuckoo
says who? Certainly not Abdo.Club 19 to be announced this year too with png
Now you believe abdo ?says who? Certainly not Abdo.
You didnt answer, says who?Now you believe abdo ?