I never said anything about any of what you’re referring to in your reply here.
All I said is that the bid still got rejected after Moffett claims it had a fee attached to the proposal.
Correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t the ARLC not even bother to meet with them when they were over in NZ? Wasn’t it only Searles bid that they met with? Or was it Endacott’s?
Either way, Moffett is bad juju.
They can't accept all the bids..
the " rejected " aren’t necessarily inadequate, rather less favourable. Some have better infrastructure , organisation or funding ect.
I'm sure that it's the Searle bids that had very heavy financial backing.
Look, you don’t like Moffett and perhaps others don't also but I won't be believing that that is the sole reason for the bids rejection. There's many nuances to this multifaceted process of which we are privy to next to nothing...
We'll just have to see how it plays out..
Or jump to conclusions lol